ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Therapeutic effects of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide on refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulatory effect of Qihuang Biwen decoction and its postbiotic product.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation in pediatric healthcare: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): current clinical challenges and therapeutic perspectives.Annals of hematology · 2022Review
- Current therapeutic strategies and perspectives in refractory ITP: What have we learned recently?Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Identifying and treating refractory ITP: difficulty in diagnosis and role of combination treatment.Blood · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic effects of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide on refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) were investigated. We retrospectively analyzed 249 patients with refractory ITP who were admitted to Qingdao Hiser Medical Group between March 2013 and March 2017. Curative effects of patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and combination therapy were observed and the changes of platelet count, PA IgG, and lymphocyte CD20 before and after treatment, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment, were compared. There was no significant difference in the expression of lymphocyte CD20, PA IgG and platelet count among the three groups of refractory ITP patients before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the expression levels of CD20 and PA IgG in lymphocytes were significantly downregulated, and platelet counts significantly increased in the three groups (P<0.05). After treatment, CD20 and PA IgG levels in combined therapy group were significantly lower, and platelet count was significantly higher, than those in the rituximab and cyclophosphamide groups (P<0.05). Also, after rituximab treatment, the expression levels of CD20 and PA IgG in lymphocytes were significantly lower than those in cyclophosphamide group (P<0.05), and platelet count was higher than that in cyclophosphamide group (P<0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate in combined therapy group was higher than that in the rituximab and cyclophosphamide group (P<0.05). Total effective rate of rituximab group was significantly higher than that of cyclophosphamide group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in combined therapy group was 14.29% (12/84), which was significantly lower than that in cyclophosphamide group (40.70%, 35/86, P<0.05) and rituximab group (29.11%, 23/79, P<0.05). The application of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of refractory ITP can improve patients clinical symptoms. The efficacy of this technique is promising with no serious adverse reactions. This technique should be popularized in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.