Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867620›Full record

ArticleMachine learning2017

Preserving differential privacy in convolutional deep belief networks.

NhatHai Phan, Xintao Wu, Dejing Dou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Analysis of Application Examples of Differential Privacy in Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  4. [Segmentation of organs at risk in nasopharyngeal cancer for radiotherapy using a self-adaptive Unet network].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

NhatHai PhanNew Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Xintao WuUniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Dejing DouUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Funding

Understanding the Mechanism of Social Network Influence in Health Outcomes througR01GM103309 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI DOU, DEJING · 2013 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable development of deep learning in medicine and healthcare domain presents obvious privacy issues, when deep neural networks are built on users' personal and highly sensitive data, e.g., clinical records, user profiles, biomedical images, etc. However, only a few scientific studies on preserving privacy in deep learning have been conducted. In this paper, we focus on developing a private convolutional deep belief network (pCDBN), which essentially is a convolutional deep belief network (CDBN) under differential privacy. Our main idea of enforcing

Indexed as

Deep learningDifferential privacyHealth informaticsHuman behavior predictionImage classification

Identifiers

PMID30867620
PMCPMC6411072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.