ArticleJournal of human genetics2019
Investigating the role of genetic counseling in neuromuscular disease considering life events.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Testing for Neuromuscular Diseases.Practical neurology (Fort Washington, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Inappropriate Metacognitive Status Increases State Anxiety in Genetic Counseling Clients.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic diagnoses are becoming a routine in the medical practice of neuromuscular diseases. Many diagnoses, however, can have an influence on relatives and family members and thus must be handled carefully by genetic counseling (GC). Here, we aimed to assess the purpose of undergoing GC to verify the utility of collaborations between clinical and genetic divisions. We investigated consecutive GC cases of neuromuscular disease and examined the role of GC. Our study included 102 cases who underwent GC in our hospital from July 2005 to March 2018: 86.3% were women and 45.1% were in their 30's. Disease explanation was the most common reason for attending GC (29.4%), followed by prenatal diagnosis (25.5%), pre-symptomatic diagnosis (17.6%), and carrier diagnosis (14.7%). Clients typically visited the hospital for GC when some kind of life event occurred, such as marriage, had a desire to bear a child, or a change in the condition of the proband. Clinicians should be conscious of such life events from the perspective of both the client and their relatives, and guide the GC at an appropriate time. Overall, the degree of recognition of genetic risk by clients differed; thus, it is important for GC to determine the status of each unique situation and respond individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.