Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867480›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner.

Akmal Sabarudin, Tiong Wei Siong, Ang Wee Chin, Ng Kwan Hoong, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Low dose radiation therapy for COVID-19: Effective dose and estimation of cancer risk.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akmal SabarudinDiagnostic Imaging & Radiotherapy Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-7917
Tiong Wei SiongDiagnostic Imaging & Radiotherapy Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ang Wee ChinDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81300, Johor Bharu, Johor, Malaysia.
Ng Kwan HoongDepartment of Biomedical Imaging, Universiti of Malaya Medical Centre, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Khalis Abdul KarimDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. khalis.karim@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-4193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this report we have evaluated radiation effective dose received by patients during ECG-gated CCTA examinations based on gender, heart rate, tube voltage protocol and body mass index (BMI). A total of 1,824 patients were retrospectively recruited (1,139 men and 685 women) and they were divided into Group 1 (CCTA with calcium scoring), Group 2 (CCTA without calcium scoring) and Group 3 (only calcium scoring), where the association between gender, heart rate, tube voltage protocol and body mass index (BMI) were analysed. Examinations were performed using a retrospective ECG-gated CCTA protocol and the effective doses were calculated from the dose length product with a conversion coefficient of 0.026 mSv.mGy

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingComputed Tomography AngiographyElectrocardiographyRadiation DosageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCalciumDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation ExposureYoung AdultCalcium

Identifiers

PMID30867480
PMCPMC6416329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.