Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867449›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Different somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on their origin.

Rebekka Mai, Daniel Kaemmerer, Tina Träger, Elisa Neubauer, Jörg Sänger, Richard P Baum, Stefan Schulz, Amelie Lupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of dual SSTRSC medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of a NewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekka MaiInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Daniel KaemmererDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Tina TrägerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Elisa NeubauerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jörg SängerInstitute of Pathology and Cytology Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Richard P BaumCenter for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Stefan SchulzInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-8885
Amelie LuppInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. Amelie.Lupp@med.uni-jena.de.
Jena University Hospital · DEZentralklinik Bad Berka · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatostatin receptors (SST), especially SST2A, are known for their overexpression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN). The chemokine receptor CXCR4, in contrast, is considered to be present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumors. However, comprehensive data are still lacking on potential differences in SST or CXCR4 expression pattern in GEP-NEN in dependence on the place of origin. Overall, 412 samples from 165 GEP-NEN patients, comprising both primary tumors (PT) and metastases (MTS), originating from different parts of the gastrointestinal tract or the pancreas were evaluated for SST and CXCR4 expression by means of immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. SST2A was present in 85% of PT with a high intensity of expression, followed by SST5 (23%), CXCR4 (21%), SST3 (10%), SST1 (9%), and SST4 (4%). PT displayed higher SST2A and chromogranin A (CgA) expression levels than MTS. In both PT and MTS lower SST2A and CgA expression levels were found in tumors originating from the appendix or colon, compared to tumors from other origins. Tumors derived from appendix or colon were associated with significantly worse patient outcomes. Positive correlations were noted between SST2A and CgA as well as between CXCR4 and Ki-67 expression levels. SST2A and CgA negativity of the tumors was significantly associated with poor patient outcomes. All in all, SST2A was the most prominent receptor expressed in the GEP-NEN samples investigated. However, expression levels varied considerably depending on the location of the primary tumor.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, SomatostatinYoung AdultCXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, Somatostatin

Identifiers

PMID30867449
PMCPMC6416272
OpenAlexW2921882373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.