Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867291›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Estimating average single-neuron visual receptive field sizes by fMRI.

Georgios A Keliris, Qinglin Li, Amalia Papanikolaou, Nikos K Logothetis, Stelios M Smirnakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spatial Frequency Tuning Follows Scale Invariance in the Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Grouping cells in primate visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Analytic Model for Feature Maps in the Primary Visual Cortex.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgios A KelirisBio-Imaging Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium; georgios.keliris@uantwerpen.be smsmirnakis@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-1261
Qinglin LiBio-Imaging Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amalia PapanikolaouPhysiology of Cognitive Processes, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Nikos K LogothetisPhysiology of Cognitive Processes, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Stelios M SmirnakisDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; georgios.keliris@uantwerpen.be smsmirnakis@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Population receptive field analysis in subjects with area V1+ lesions.R01EY024019 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SMIRNAKIS, STELIOS MANOLIS · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noninvasive estimation of neuronal receptive field (RF) properties in vivo allows a detailed understanding of brain organization as well as its plasticity by longitudinal following of potential changes. Visual RFs measured invasively by electrophysiology in animal models have traditionally provided a great extent of our current knowledge about the visual brain and its disorders. Voxel-based estimates of population RF (pRF) by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans revolutionized the field and have been used extensively in numerous studies. However, current methods cannot estimate single-neuron RF sizes as they reflect large populations of neurons with individual RF scatter. Here, we introduce an approach to estimate RF size using spatial frequency selectivity to checkerboard patterns. This method allowed us to obtain noninvasive, average single-neuron RF estimates over a large portion of human early visual cortex. These estimates were significantly smaller compared with prior pRF methods. Furthermore, fMRI and electrophysiology experiments in nonhuman primates demonstrated an exceptionally good match, validating the approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingComputer SimulationElectrophysiologyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, AnimalNeuronsVisual CortexVisual Fieldscomputational modelingelectrophysiologyfMRIpopulation receptive fieldsvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30867291
PMCPMC6442598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.