Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867240›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2019

Distinctive Effects of GM-CSF and M-CSF on Proliferation and Polarization of Two Major Pulmonary Macrophage Populations.

Christina Draijer, Loka Raghu Kumar Penke, Marc Peters-Golden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina DraijerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and.ORCID 0000-0002-7466-0437
Loka Raghu Kumar PenkeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-7950
Marc Peters-GoldenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and petersm@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9768-0262
University of Michigan · US

Funding

PULMONARY CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TRAININGT32HL007749 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Pickett Dickson · 1993 to 2026
$19.9M
Novel Functions of Lung Macrophages and Fibroblasts in Pulmonary Inflammation and FibrosisR35HL144979 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERS-GOLDEN, MARC L · 2019 to 2025
$6.5M
Secreted SOCS Proteins as Vectors of Lung Macrophage to Epithelial Cell CrosstalkR01HL125555 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERS-GOLDEN, MARC L · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125555NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL144979NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GM-CSF is required for alveolar macrophage (AM) development shortly after birth and for maintenance of AM functions throughout life, whereas M-CSF is broadly important for macrophage differentiation and self-renewal. However, the comparative actions of GM-CSF and M-CSF on AMs are incompletely understood. Interstitial macrophages (IMs) constitute a second major pulmonary macrophage population. However, unlike AMs, IM responses to CSFs are largely unknown. Proliferation, phenotypic identity, and M1/M2 polarization are important attributes of all macrophage populations, and in this study, we compared their modulation by GM-CSF and M-CSF in murine primary AMs and IMs. CSFs increased the proliferation capacity and upregulated antiapoptotic gene expression in AMs but not IMs. GM-CSF, but not M-CSF, reinforced the cellular identity, as identified by surface markers, of both cell types. GM-CSF, but not M-CSF, increased the expression of both M1 and M2 markers exclusively in AMs. Finally, CSFs enhanced the IFN-γ- and IL-4-induced polarization ability of AMs but not IMs. These first (to our knowledge) data comparing effects on the two pulmonary macrophage populations demonstrate that the activating actions of GM-CSF and M-CSF on primary AMs are not conserved in primary IMs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationCell ProliferationGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMacrophages, AlveolarMaleMiceAntigens, DifferentiationGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorIFNG protein, mouseIl4 protein, mouseInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID30867240
PMCPMC6478555
OpenAlexW2922137965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.