Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867217›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

Sustainability and Scale of the Saving Mothers, Giving Life Approach in Uganda and Zambia.

Jessica Healey, Claudia Morrissey Conlon, Kennedy Malama, Reeti Hobson, Frank Kaharuza, Adeodata Kekitiinwa, Marta Levitt, Davy Wadula Zulu, Lawrence Marum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Saving Mothers, Giving Life: It Takes a System to Save a Mother.Global health, science and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica HealeyU.S. Agency for International Development, Lusaka, Zambia. Now based in Monrovia, Liberia. jhealey@usaid.gov.
Claudia Morrissey ConlonBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Kennedy MalamaMinistry of Health, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Reeti HobsonICF, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Frank KaharuzaHIV Health Office, U.S. Agency for International Development, Kampala, Uganda.
Adeodata KekitiinwaBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Marta LevittBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development and RTI, Washington, DC, USA. Now with Palladium, Abuja, Nigeria.
Davy Wadula ZuluMinistry of Health, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lawrence MarumU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia. Now retired.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) significantly reduced maternal and perinatal mortality in Uganda and Zambia by using a district health systems strengthening approach to address the key delays women and newborns face in receiving quality, timely, and appropriate medical care. This article documents the transition of SMGL from pilot to scale in Uganda and Zambia and analyzes the sustainability of the approach, examining the likelihood of maintaining positive trends in maternal and newborn health in both countries.

methodsWe analyzed the potential sustainment of SMGL achievements using a tool adapted from the HIV-focused domains and elements of the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Sustainability Index and Dashboard for maternal and neonatal health pro-gramming adding a domain on community normative change. Information for each of the 5 resulting domains was drawn from SMGL and non-SMGL reports, individual stakeholder interviews, and group discussions.

findingsIn both Uganda and Zambia, the SMGL proof-of-concept phase catalyzed commitment to saving mothers and newborns and a renewed belief that significant change is possible. Increased leadership and accountability for maternal and newborn health, particularly at the district and facility levels, was bolstered by routine maternal death surveillance reviews that engaged a wide range of local leadership. The SMGL district-strengthening model was found to be cost-effective with cost of death averted estimated at US$177-206 per year of life gained. When further considering the ripple effect that saving a mother has on child survival and the household economy, the value of SMGL increases. Ministries of health and donor agencies have already demonstrated a willingness to pay this amount per year of life for other programs, such as HIV and AIDS.

conclusionAs SMGL scaled up in both Uganda and Zambia, the intentional integration of SMGL interventions into host country systems, alignment with other large-scale programs, and planned reductions in annual SMGL funding all contributed to increasing host government ownership of the interventions and set the SMGL approach on a path more likely to be sustained following the close of the initiative. Lessons from the learning districts resulted in increased efficiency in allocation of resources for maternal and newborn health, better use of strategic information, improved management capacities, and increased community engagement.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyUgandaZambia

Identifiers

PMID30867217
PMCPMC6519672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.