Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867215›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

Did Saving Mothers, Giving Life Expand Timely Access to Lifesaving Care in Uganda? A Spatial District-Level Analysis of Travel Time to Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care.

Michelle M Schmitz, Florina Serbanescu, Vincent Kamara, Joan Marie Kraft, Marc Cunningham, Gregory Opio, Patrick Komakech, Claudia Morrissey Conlon, Mary M Goodwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Saving Mothers, Giving Life: It Takes a System to Save a Mother.Global health, science and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle M SchmitzDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Florina SerbanescuDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. fxs7@cdc.gov.
Vincent KamaraBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Joan Marie KraftDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marc CunninghamBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Gregory OpioInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kibaale, Uganda.
Patrick KomakechDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Claudia Morrissey ConlonBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary M GoodwinDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterventions for the Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) initiative aimed to ensure all pregnant women in SMGL-supported districts have timely access to emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC). Spatial travel-time analyses provide a visualization of changes in timely access.

methodsWe compared travel-time estimates to EmONC health facilities in SMGL-supported districts in western Uganda in 2012, 2013, and 2016. To examine EmONC access, we analyzed a categorical variable of travel-time duration in 30-minute increments. Data sources included health facility assessments, geographic coordinates of EmONC facilities, geolocated population estimates of women of reproductive age (WRA), and other road network and geographic sources.

resultsThe number of EmONC facilities almost tripled between 2012 and 2016, increasing geographic access to EmONC. Estimated travel time to EmONC facilities declined significantly during the 5-year period. The proportion of WRA able to access any EmONC and comprehensive EmONC (CEmONC) facility within 2 hours by motorcycle increased by 18% (from 61.3% to 72.1%,

conclusionsLargely due to the SMGL-supported expansion of EmONC capability, timely access to EmONC significantly improved. Our analysis developed a geographic outline of facility accessibility using multiple types of transportation. Spatial travel-time analyses, along with other EmONC indicators, can be used by planners and policy makers to estimate need and target underserved populations to achieve further gains in EmONC accessibility. In addition to increasing the number and geographic distribution of EmONC facilities, complementary efforts to make motorized transportation available are necessary to achieve meaningful increases in EmONC access.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMiddle AgedPregnancySpatial AnalysisTime-to-TreatmentTravelUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30867215
PMCPMC6519675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.