Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867212›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

The Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of a District-Strengthening Strategy to Mitigate the 3 Delays to Quality Maternal Health Care: Results From Uganda and Zambia.

Benjamin Johns, Peter Hangoma, Lynn Atuyambe, Sophie Faye, Mark Tumwine, Collen Zulu, Marta Levitt, Tannia Tembo, Jessica Healey, Rui Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Saving Mothers, Giving Life: It Takes a System to Save a Mother.Global health, science and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin JohnsInternational Development Division, Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA. ben_johns@abtassoc.com.
Peter HangomaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lynn AtuyambeDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sophie FayeInternational Development Division, Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark TumwineUganda Country Office, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Entebbe, Uganda.
Collen ZuluU.S. Agency for International Development, Lusaka, Zambia.
Marta LevittBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA, and RTI, Washington, DC, USA. Now with Palladium, Abuja, Nigeria.
Tannia TemboCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jessica HealeyU.S. Agency for International Development, Lusaka, Zambia. Now based in Monrovia, Liberia.
Rui LiDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christine MugashaU.S. Agency for International Development, Kampala, Uganda.
Florina SerbanescuDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Claudia Morrissey ConlonBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to estimate the costs and the incremental cost-effectiveness of maternal and newborn care associated with the Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) initiative-a comprehensive district-strengthening approach addressing the 3 delays associated with maternal mortality-in Uganda and Zambia. To assess effectiveness, we used a before-after design comparing facility outcome data from 2012 (before) and 2016 (after). To estimate costs, we used unit costs collected from comparison districts in 2016 coupled with data on health services utilization from 2012 in SMGL-supported districts to estimate the costs before the start of SMGL. We collected data from health facilities, ministerial health offices, and implementing partners for the year 2016 in 2 SMGL-supported districts in each country and in 3 comparison non-SMGL districts (2 in Zambia, 1 in Uganda). Incremental costs for maternal and newborn health care per SMGL-supported district in 2016 was estimated to be US$845,000 in Uganda and $760,000 in Zambia. The incremental cost per delivery was estimated to be $38 in Uganda and $95 in Zambia. For the districts included in this study, SMGL maternal and newborn health activities were associated with approximately 164 deaths averted in Uganda and 121 deaths averted in Zambia in 2016 compared to 2012. In Uganda, the cost per death averted was $10,311, or $177 per life-year gained. In Zambia, the cost per death averted was $12,514, or $206 per life-year gained. The SMGL approach can be very cost-effective, with the cost per life-year gained as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP) being 25.6% and 16.4% in Uganda and Zambia, respectively. In terms of affordability, the SMGL approach could be paid for by increasing health spending from 7.3% to 7.5% of GDP in Uganda and from 5.4% to 5.8% in Zambia.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancyUgandaZambia

Identifiers

PMID30867212
PMCPMC6519668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.