Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867211›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

Addressing the Third Delay in Saving Mothers, Giving Life Districts in Uganda and Zambia: Ensuring Adequate and Appropriate Facility-Based Maternal and Perinatal Health Care.

Diane Morof, Florina Serbanescu, Mary M Goodwin, Davidson H Hamer, Alice R Asiimwe, Leoda Hamomba, Masuka Musumali, Susanna Binzen, Adeodata Kekitiinwa, Brenda Picho and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Saving Mothers, Giving Life: It Takes a System to Save a Mother.Global health, science and practice · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Diane MorofDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. dmorof@cdc.gov.
Florina SerbanescuDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mary M GoodwinDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Alice R AsiimweBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Leoda HamombaDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.
Masuka MusumaliFamily Health Division, U.S. Agency for International Development, Lusaka, Zambia.
Susanna BinzenDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Adeodata KekitiinwaBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Brenda PichoInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Frank KaharuzaHIV Health Office, U.S. Agency for International Development, Kampala, Uganda.
Phoebe Monalisa NamukanjaDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Dan MurokoraBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Vincent KamaraBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Michelle DynesDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Curtis BlantonDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Agnes NalutaayaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Fredrick LuwagaBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Michelle M SchmitzDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jonathan LaBrecqueBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington DC. Now with Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Claudia Morrissey ConlonBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Brian McCarthyEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Charlan KroelingerDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas ClarkDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) is a 5-year initiative implemented in participating districts in Uganda and Zambia that aimed to reduce deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth by targeting the 3 delays to receiving appropriate care: seeking, reaching, and receiving. Approaches to addressing the third delay included adequate health facility infrastructure, specifically sufficient equipment and medications; trained providers to provide quality evidence-based care; support for referrals to higher-level care; and effective maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response.

methodsSMGL used a mixed-methods approach to describe intervention strategies, outcomes, and health impacts. Programmatic and monitoring and evaluation data-health facility assessments, facility and community surveillance, and population-based mortality studies-were used to document the effectiveness of intervention components.

resultsDuring the SMGL initiative, the proportion of facilities providing emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) increased from 10% to 25% in Uganda and from 6% to 12% in Zambia. Correspondingly, the delivery rate occurring in EmONC facilities increased from 28.2% to 41.0% in Uganda and from 26.0% to 29.1% in Zambia. Nearly all facilities had at least one trained provider on staff by the endline evaluation. Staffing increases allowed a higher proportion of health centers to provide care 24 hours a day/7 days a week by endline-from 74.6% to 82.9% in Uganda and from 64.8% to 95.5% in Zambia. During this period, referral communication improved from 93.3% to 99.0% in Uganda and from 44.6% to 100% in Zambia, and data systems to identify and analyze causes of maternal and perinatal deaths were established and strengthened.

conclusionSMGL's approach was associated with improvements in facility infrastructure, equipment, medication, access to skilled staff, and referral mechanisms and led to declines in facility maternal and perinatal mortality rates. Further work is needed to sustain these gains and to eliminate preventable maternal and perinatal deaths.

Indexed as

FemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancyUgandaZambia

Identifiers

PMID30867211
PMCPMC6519670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.