Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867209›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

Addressing the First Delay in Saving Mothers, Giving Life Districts in Uganda and Zambia: Approaches and Results for Increasing Demand for Facility Delivery Services.

Florina Serbanescu, Mary M Goodwin, Susanna Binzen, Diane Morof, Alice R Asiimwe, Laura Kelly, Christina Wakefield, Brenda Picho, Jessica Healey, Agnes Nalutaaya and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Strategy for Reducing Maternal Mortality in Rural Kenya.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Florina SerbanescuDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. fxs7@cdc.gov.
Mary M GoodwinDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susanna BinzenDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Diane MorofDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alice R AsiimweBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Laura KellyDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Now with Deloitte Consulting, LLP, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christina WakefieldSocial and Behavior Change, The Manoff Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Brenda PichoInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jessica HealeyU.S. Agency for International Development, Lusaka, Zambia. Now based in Monrovia, Liberia.
Agnes NalutaayaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Leoda HamombaDivision of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Vincent KamaraBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Gregory OpioInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kibaale, Uganda.
Frank KaharuzaBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Curtis BlantonDivision of Reproductive Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Fredrick LuwagaBaylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation-Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Mona SteffenBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC. Now with ICF, Rockville, MD, USA.
Claudia Morrissey ConlonBureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL), a 5-year initiative implemented in selected districts in Uganda and Zambia, was designed to reduce deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth by targeting the 3 delays to receiving appropriate care at birth. While originally the "Three Delays" model was designed to focus on curative services that encompass emergency obstetric care, SMGL expanded its application to primary and secondary prevention of obstetric complications. Prevention of the "first delay" focused on addressing factors influencing the decision to seek delivery care at a health facility. Numerous factors can contribute to the first delay, including a lack of birth planning, unfamiliarity with pregnancy danger signs, poor perceptions of facility care, and financial or geographic barriers. SMGL addressed these barriers through community engagement on safe motherhood, public health outreach, community workers who identified pregnant women and encouraged facility delivery, and incentives to deliver in a health facility. SMGL used qualitative and quantitative methods to describe intervention strategies, intervention outcomes, and health impacts. Partner reports, health facility assessments (HFAs), facility and community surveillance, and population-based mortality studies were used to document activities and measure health outcomes in SMGL-supported districts. SMGL's approach led to unprecedented community outreach on safe motherhood issues in SMGL districts. About 3,800 community health care workers in Uganda and 1,558 in Zambia were engaged. HFAs indicated that facility deliveries rose significantly in SMGL districts. In Uganda, the proportion of births that took place in facilities rose from 45.5% to 66.8% (47% increase); similarly, in Zambia SMGL districts, facility deliveries increased from 62.6% to 90.2% (44% increase). In both countries, the proportion of women delivering in facilities equipped to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care also increased (from 28.2% to 41.0% in Uganda and from 26.0% to 29.1% in Zambia). The districts documented declines in the number of maternal deaths due to not accessing facility care during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period in both countries. This reduction played a significant role in the decline of the maternal mortality ratio in SMGL-supported districts in Uganda but not in Zambia. Further work is needed to sustain gains and to eliminate preventable maternal and perinatal deaths.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal DeathMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancyUgandaZambia

Identifiers

PMID30867209
PMCPMC6519679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.