Observational studyBMJ open2019
Association between full monitoring of biomedical and lifestyle target indicators and HbA
Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of AI-based interventions in diabetes personalized management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on perceived diabetes care and regulation, with a focus on ethnic minorities: a mixed-methods study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on diabetes care: the perspective of healthcare providers across Europe.Primary care diabetes · 2023Article
- Experiences with tailoring of primary diabetes care in well-organised general practices: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Socioeconomic status is not associated with the delivery of care in people with diabetes but does modify HbA1c levels: An observational cohort study (Elzha-cohort 1).International journal of clinical practice · 2021Observational
- What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review.Family practice · 2020Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveManagement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires frequent monitoring of patients. Within a collective care group setting, doubts on the clinical effects of registration are a barrier for full adoption of T2DM registration in general practice. We explored whether full monitoring of biomedical and lifestyle-related target indicators within a care group approach is associated with lower HbA
designObservational, real-life cohort study.
settingPrimary care data registry from the Hadoks (EerstelijnsZorggroepHaaglanden) care group. EXPOSURE: The care group provides general practitioners collectively with organisational support to facilitate structured T2DM primary care. Patients are offered quarterly medical and lifestyle-related consultation.
main outcome measureFull monitoring of each target indicator in patients with T2DM which includes minimally one measure of HbA
resultsCompared with incompletely monitored patients, fully monitored patients had significantly lower HbA CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThis study shows that in a care group setting, fully monitored patients had significantly lower HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.