ArticleBMJ open2019
Acute coronary syndromes presentations and care outcomes in white, South Asian and Chinese patients: a cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Chronic Hemodialysis Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Tertiary Public Hospital in the Philippines.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Article
- Association Between Angina Symptom Characteristics and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2025Article
- Deep learning on electrocardiogram waveforms to stratify risk of obstructive stable coronary artery disease.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Prevalence of classic and non-classic pain sites of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Patients With STEMI and COVID-19 Between Canada and the United States.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2023Article
- Article
- Variation in Seeking Care for Cardiovascular Disease and Ambulance Utilization among Migrants in Australia: Time, Ethnicity, and Delay (TED) Study III.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Gender-stratified analyses of symptoms associated with acute coronary syndrome in telephone triage: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Review
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Nationally Representative Sample.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSuccessful treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) relies on its rapid recognition. It is unclear whether the accepted presentation of chest pain applies to different ethnic groups. We thus examined potential ethnic variations in ACS symptoms and clinical care outcomes in white, South Asian and Chinese patients.
designCross-sectional survey.
settingParticipants were hospitalised at 1 of 12 Canadian centres across four provinces.
participants1334 patients with ACS (630 white; 488 South Asian; 216 Chinese).
main outcome measuresACS presentation symptoms (classic/typical midsternal pain/discomfort with or without radiation to the left neck, shoulder or arm) were assessed by self-report. Clinical care outcomes (time to emergency room [ER] presentation, cardiac catheterisation; receipt of cardiac catheterisation, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) were obtained by health record audit.
resultsThe mean age of the sample was 62 years and 30% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The most common presenting symptom was midsternal pain/discomfort of any intensity regardless of ethnic status. Yet, a substantial proportion of patients reported atypical symptoms (33% white, 19% South Asian, 20% Chinese; p<0.006). After adjustment for age, sex, education, current smoking, extent of coronary artery disease, presence of diabetes or chronic kidney disease and STEMI vs non-STEMI/unstable angina, South Asians were more likely to present with at least moderate intensity midsternal pain/discomfort (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.44; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.98), whereas Chinese were less likely to present with radiating symptoms (AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74) compared with whites. South Asians with atypical pain (relative to those with midsternal pain/discomfort) took significantly longer to present to the ER (p=0.037), and were less likely to receive PCI (p=0.008) or CABG (p=0.041).
conclusionsAtypical presentations were associated with greater delays in arrival to the emergency department and reduced invasive cardiovascular care in South Asians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.