Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867174›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2019

Rourke Baby Record 2017: Clinical update for preventive care of children up to 5 years of age.

Patricia Li, Leslie Rourke, Denis Leduc, Stephani Arulthas, Karen Rezk, James Rourke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The person, not just the problem.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  11. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  12. Getting standardization right.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  13. Rethinking screening during and after COVID-19: Should things ever be the same again?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  15. Interim schedule for pregnant women and children during the COVID-19 pandemic.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Assessing wellness in the well-child check: What about social and emotional development?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia LiAssistant Professor of Pediatrics in the Faculty of Medicine at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Que.
Leslie RourkeProfessor Emerita in the Faculty of Medicine at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St John's. lrourke@mun.ca.
Denis LeducAssociate Professor of Pediatrics in the Faculty of Medicine at the McGill University Health Centre.
Stephani ArulthasWas research assistant in the Department of Pediatrics at the McGill University Health Centre.
Karen RezkWas research assistant in the Department of Pediatrics at the McGill University Health Centre.
James RourkeProfessor of Family Medicine and former Dean of Medicine at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the process and evidence used to update preventive care recommendations in the 2017 Rourke Baby Record to assist primary care providers' decisions around which maneuvers to prioritize and implement in practice. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: A search of the literature from June 2013 to June 2016 was conducted, using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology to critically appraise primary research studies, and recommendations were changed where there was substantial support from the new literature. MAIN MESSAGE: The important changes in preventive care recommendations for children up to 5 years of age include the addition of body mass index monitoring as of 2 years of age; stronger evidence to support the introduction of allergenic foods without delay (strength of recommendation change from fair to good); the recommendation to ask validated questions regarding the effects of poverty; evidence showing no safe level of lead exposure in children; the recommendation of a daily sleep duration; the upgrade of recommendation strength from fair to good of items related to the prevention and detection of adverse childhood experiences, including assessment of bruising in babies younger than 9 months; and blood pressure monitoring only for children at risk.

conclusionEarly childhood exposures and habits have short- and long-term health consequences. The Rourke Baby Record will continue to publish updates to ensure that primary care providers are equipped to promote lifelong health and well-being through evidence-informed care in young children.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCanadaChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePhysical ExaminationPreventive Health ServicesReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID30867174
PMCPMC6515953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.