Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867111›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

Auditory brainstem stimulation with a conformable microfabricated array elicits responses with tonotopically organized components.

Amélie A Guex, Ariel Edward Hight, Shreya Narasimhan, Nicolas Vachicouras, Daniel J Lee, Stéphanie P Lacour, M Christian Brown

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  4. Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amélie A GuexLaboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, School of Engineering, Institute of Microengineering & Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland.
Ariel Edward HightEaton-Peabody Laboratories and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shreya NarasimhanEaton-Peabody Laboratories and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicolas VachicourasLaboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, School of Engineering, Institute of Microengineering & Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland.
Daniel J LeeEaton-Peabody Laboratories and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stéphanie P LacourLaboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, School of Engineering, Institute of Microengineering & Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland.
M Christian BrownEaton-Peabody Laboratories and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Chris_Brown@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

DESCENDING SYSTEMS TO THE COCHLEA AND COCHLEAR NUCLEUSR01DC001089 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI BROWN, M. CHRISTIAN · 1991 to 2019
$5.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) restore hearing to deaf individuals not eligible for cochlear implants. Speech comprehension in ABI users is generally poor compared to that of cochlear implant users, and side effects are common. The poor performance may result from activating broad areas and multiple neuronal populations of the cochlear nucleus, however detailed studies of the responses to surface stimulation of the cochlear nucleus are lacking. A conformable electrode array was microfabricated to fit on the rat's dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). It hosts 20 small electrodes (each 100 μm diam.). The array was tested by recording evoked potentials and neural activity along the tonotopic axis of the inferior colliculus (IC). Almost all bipolar electrode pairs elicited responses, in some cases with an even, or relatively constant, pattern of thresholds and supra-threshold measures along the long axis of the array. This pattern suggests that conformable arrays can provide relatively constant excitation along the surface of the DCN and thus might decrease the ABI side effects caused by spread of high current to adjacent structures. We also examined tonotopic patterns of the IC responses. Compared to sound-evoked responses, electrically-evoked response mappings had less tonotopic organization and were broader in width. They became more tonotopic when the evoked activity common to all electrodes and the late phase of response were subtracted out, perhaps because the remaining activity is from tonotopically organized principal cells of the DCN. Responses became less tonotopic when inter-electrode distance was increased from 400 μm to 800 μm but were relatively unaffected by changing to monopolar stimulation. The results illustrate the challenges of using a surface array to present tonotopic cues and improve speech comprehension in humans who use the ABI.

Indexed as

Auditory Brain Stem ImplantsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochlear NucleusElectric StimulationInferior ColliculiMaleMaterials TestingProsthesis DesignRats, Sprague-DawleyABIAuditory brainstem implantAuditory neuroprosthesisElectrical stimulationMicroelectrodeNeural stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30867111
PMCPMC6519443
OpenAlexW2916728593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.