Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867067›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2019

Prebiotic supplementation in frail older people affects specific gut microbiota taxa but not global diversity.

Tam T T Tran, Fabien J Cousin, Denise B Lynch, Ravi Menon, Jennifer Brulc, Jillian R-M Brown, Eileen O'Herlihy, Ludovica F Butto, Katie Power, Ian B Jeffery and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tam T T TranAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Fabien J CousinAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Denise B LynchAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Ravi MenonThe Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, General Mills Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jennifer BrulcThe Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, General Mills Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jillian R-M BrownAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Eileen O'HerlihyAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Ludovica F ButtoAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Katie PowerAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Ian B JefferyAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Eibhlís M O'ConnorAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Paul W O'TooleAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland. pwotoole@ucc.ie.
University College Cork · IENational University of Ireland · IEGeneral Mills (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are complex interactions between aging, frailty, diet, and the gut microbiota; modulation of the gut microbiota by diet could lead to healthier aging. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of diets differing in sugar, fat, and fiber content upon the gut microbiota of mice humanized with microbiota from healthy or frail older people. We also performed a 6-month dietary fiber supplementation in three human cohorts representing three distinct life-stages.

methodsMice were colonized with human microbiota and then underwent an 8-week dietary intervention with either a high-fiber/low-fat diet typical of elderly community dwellers or a low-fiber/high-fat diet typical of long-stay residential care subjects. A cross-over design was used where the diets were switched after 4 weeks to the other diet type to identify responsive taxa and innate immunity changes. In the human intervention, the subjects supplemented their normal diet with a mix of five prebiotics (wheat dextrin, resistant starch, polydextrose, soluble corn fiber, and galactooligo-saccharide) at 10 g/day combined total, for healthy subjects and 20 g/day for frail subjects, or placebo (10 g/day maltodextrin) for 26 weeks. The gut microbiota was profiled and immune responses were assayed by T cell markers in mice, and serum cytokines in humans.

resultsHumanized mice maintained gut microbiota types reflecting the respective healthy or frail human donor. Changes in abundance of specific taxa occurred with the diet switch. In mice with the community type microbiota, the observed differences reflected compositions previously associated with higher frailty. The dominance of Prevotella present initially in community inoculated mice was replaced by Bacteroides, Alistipes, and Oscillibacter. Frail type microbiota showed a differential effect on innate immune markers in both conventional and germ-free mice, but a moderate number of taxonomic changes occurring upon diet switch with an increase in abundance of Parabacteroides, Blautia, Clostridium cluster IV, and Phascolarctobacterium. In the human intervention, prebiotic supplementation did not drive any global changes in alpha- or beta-diversity, but the abundance of certain bacterial taxa, particularly Ruminococcaceae (Clostridium cluster IV), Parabacteroides, Phascolarctobacterium, increased, and levels of the chemokine CXCL11 were significantly lower in the frail elderly group, but increased during the wash-out period.

conclusionsSwitching to a nutritionally poorer diet has a profound effect on the microbiota in mouse models, with changes in the gut microbiota from healthy donors reflecting previously observed differences between elderly frail and non-frail individuals. However, the frailty-associated gut microbiota did not reciprocally switch to a younger healthy-subject like state, and supplementation with prebiotics was associated with fewer detected effects in humans than diet adjustment in animal models.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityChemokine CXCL11Cross-Over StudiesFecesFemaleFrail ElderlyGastrointestinal TractGerm-Free LifeHumansImmunity, InnateMaleChemokine CXCL11CXCL11 protein, humanPrebioticsAgingElderlyGut microbiotaInnate immune responseMicrobiomePrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID30867067
PMCPMC6417215
OpenAlexW2939850533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.