Trial reportRespiratory research2019
Effect of pirfenidone in patients with more advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label Extension Study of the Long Term Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Anlotinib Capsules for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)/Progressive Fibrosis-interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILDs)
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Advanced Versus Non-Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analysis of Six Clinical Studies.Advances in therapy · 2023Trial
- Enhanced fatty acid availability rewires fibroblasts metabolism and decreases collagen deposition in lung fibrosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Maintenance of Effectiveness of Pirfenidone in Elderly Patients with Progressive Functional Impairment: A Real-World Retrospective Study in IPF.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2024Review
- Bibliometric analysis of the pirfenidone and nintedanib in interstitial lung diseases.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand 2023 revision.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2024Article
- Review
- Clinical management and acute exacerbations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Spain: results from the OASIS study.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Article
- Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Cureus · 2021Review
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with severe physiologic impairment: characteristics and outcomes.Respiratory research · 2021Article
- A Review of Pirfenidone as an Anti-Fibrotic in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Its Probable Role in Other Diseases.Cureus · 2021Review
- Regulatory Immune Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Friends or Foes?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Assessing the Effectiveness of Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Long-Term, Real-World Data from European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg).Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Deep learning in interstitial lung disease-how long until daily practice.European radiology · 2020Review
- Antifibrotic Drug Use in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the IPF-PRO Registry.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
- Changes in management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: impact on disease severity and mortality.European clinical respiratory journal · 2020Article
- Review
- Nutrition in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Critical Issues Analysis and Future Research Directions.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Scarred Lung. An Update on Radiation-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Data from controlled clinical studies in patients with more advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) could inform clinical practice, but they are limited, since this sub-population is usually excluded from clinical trials. These exploratory post-hoc analyses of the open-label, long-term extension study RECAP (NCT00662038) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with more advanced IPF. Patients were categorised according to the extent of lung function impairment at baseline: more advanced (percent predicted FVC <50% and/or DLco <35%) and less advanced (percent predicted FVC ≥50% and DLco ≥35%).Overall, 596 patients with baseline FVC and/or DLco values available were included in the analyses; 187 patients had more advanced disease, and 409 patients had less advanced disease. Mean percent predicted FVC declined throughout 180 weeks of treatment in both more and less advanced disease subgroups. Both subgroups exhibited a similar pattern of adverse events; however, adverse events related to IPF progression were experienced by a higher proportion of patients with more advanced versus less advanced disease. Discontinuation rates due to any reason, adverse events related to IPF progression, or deaths were each higher in the more advanced versus the less advanced disease subgroup.These analyses found that longer-term pirfenidone treatment resulted in a similar rate of lung function decline and safety profile in patients with more advanced versus less advanced IPF, and the data suggest that pirfenidone is efficacious, well tolerated, and a feasible treatment option in patients with more advanced IPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.