Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866928›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia.

Edilu Jorga Sarba, Kebede Abdisa Kelbesa, Morka Dandecha Bayu, Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin, Bizunesh Mideksa Borena, Ayichew Teshale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotic Resistance of Profiles ofVeterinary medicine international · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Multidrug-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Food science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Resistance and virulence gene analysis and molecular typing ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Occurrence of extended- spectrum β-lactamase harboringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edilu Jorga SarbaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ambo University, P O Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia. jedilu8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2106-7787
Kebede Abdisa KelbesaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ambo University, P O Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Morka Dandecha BayuDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Ambo University, P O Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Endrias Zewdu GebremedhinDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ambo University, P O Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Bizunesh Mideksa BorenaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ambo University, P O Box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Ayichew TeshaleSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, P O Box 138, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Ambo University · ETWolaita Sodo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscherichia coli is bacteria that exist as commensal in the intestine of animals and humans, but pathogenic strains cause disease in chickens. The development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli is one of major concern worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November, 2015 to April, 2016 in and around Ambo town on backyard chicken with the objectives of isolating E. coli from selected visceral organs, assessment of potential risk factor and determination of antimicrobial resistance pattern of the isolates.

resultsThe overall isolation rate of E. coli was 11.5% (80/694) [95% CI: 9.64-14.61] and 32.5% (62/191) [95% CI: 25.39-39.09] at organ and chicken level, respectively. E. coli isolation rate was 15.2% (29/191), 13.6% (27/191), 6.3% (12/191) and 10.7% (13/121) from spleen, liver, kidney and ovary samples, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed higher probability of E. coli isolation from adult (adjusted Odds ratio [aOR] =2.5, P = 0.013) than younger chickens, from clinically sick chickens (aOR = 3.0, P = 0.003) than apparently healthy. E. coli isolates were 100% susceptible to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim followed by 89-63.4% susceptibility to gentamicin, streptomycin, ceftazidime, nalidxic acid, nitrofurantoin, kanamycin, amikacin and chloramphenicol. Whereas, 100% resistance was observed against cloxacilin, cefotaxime and amoxicillin, whereas 92.7 and 46.3% were resistant to cefuroxime, and tetracycline, respectively. Multidrug resistant (MDR) was observed in 78.1% (64/82) of the isolates which exhibited 5 different MDR patterns to 7 antimicrobial classes.

conclusionsHigher isolation rate of E. coli was observed from visceral organs of chickens. Age and health status were predictors of E. coli isolation. Remarkable numbers of the isolates are resistant to different antimicrobials and multidrug resistant E coli isolates are widespread in the area.

Indexed as

ChickensDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAge FactorsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEthiopiaFemaleMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPoultry DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAmboAntimicrobial resistanceChickenE. coliVisceral organ

Identifiers

PMID30866928
PMCPMC6417126
OpenAlexW2922164532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.