ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Accurate and rapid screening model for potential diabetes mellitus.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of Machine Learning Classification Models for the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The accuracy of machine learning approaches using non-image data for the prediction of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Predictive modeling of multi-class diabetes mellitus using machine learning and filtering iraqi diabetes data dynamics.PloS one · 2024Article
- Development of rapid and effective risk prediction models for stroke in the Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Exercise makes better mind: a data mining study on effect of physical activity on academic achievement of college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Environmental exposures in machine learning and data mining approaches to diabetes etiology: A scoping review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Article
- Hyperglycemia screening based on survey data: an international instrument based on WHO STEPs dataset.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Predicting Diabetes in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Using Machine-Learning Model Based on Multiple Years' Data.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022Article
- Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.Advances in computational intelligence · 2022Review
- Diabetes Mellitus Prediction and Severity Level Estimation Using OWDANN Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2021Article
- A multi-class classification model for supporting the diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus.PeerJ · 2020Article
- A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrediction or early diagnosis of diabetes is crucial for populations with high risk of diabetes.
methodsIn this study, we assessed the ability of five popular classifiers (J48, AdaboostM1, SMO, Bayes Net, and Naïve Bayes) to identify individuals with diabetes based on nine non-invasive and easily obtained clinical features, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, history of cardiovascular disease or stroke, family history of diabetes, physical activity, work stress, and salty food preference. A total of 4205 data entries were obtained from annual physical examination reports for adults in the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University during January-April 2017. Weka data mining software was used to identify the best algorithm for diabetes classification.
resultsThe results indicate that decision tree classifier J48 has the best performance (accuracy = 0.9503, precision = 0.950, recall = 0.950, F-measure = 0.948, and AUC = 0.964). The decision tree structure shows that age is the most significant feature, followed by family history of diabetes, work stress, BMI, salty food preference, physical activity, hypertension, gender, and history of cardiovascular disease or stroke.
conclusionsOur study shows that decision tree analyses can be applied to screen individuals for early diabetes risk without the need for invasive tests. This procedure will be particularly useful in developing regions with high epidemiological risk and poor socioeconomic status, and enable clinical practitioners to rapidly screen patients for increased risk of diabetes. The key features in the tree structure could further facilitate diabetes prevention through targeted community interventions, which can potentially improve early diabetes diagnosis and reduce burdens on the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.