Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866905›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

Accurate and rapid screening model for potential diabetes mellitus.

Dongmei Pei, Yang Gong, Hong Kang, Chengpu Zhang, Qiyong Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.Advances in computational intelligence · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dongmei PeiDepartment of Family Medicine, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yang GongUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hong KangUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chengpu ZhangDepartment of Family Medicine, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Qiyong GuoDepartment of radiology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. guoqy1111@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-6613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction or early diagnosis of diabetes is crucial for populations with high risk of diabetes.

methodsIn this study, we assessed the ability of five popular classifiers (J48, AdaboostM1, SMO, Bayes Net, and Naïve Bayes) to identify individuals with diabetes based on nine non-invasive and easily obtained clinical features, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, history of cardiovascular disease or stroke, family history of diabetes, physical activity, work stress, and salty food preference. A total of 4205 data entries were obtained from annual physical examination reports for adults in the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University during January-April 2017. Weka data mining software was used to identify the best algorithm for diabetes classification.

resultsThe results indicate that decision tree classifier J48 has the best performance (accuracy = 0.9503, precision = 0.950, recall = 0.950, F-measure = 0.948, and AUC = 0.964). The decision tree structure shows that age is the most significant feature, followed by family history of diabetes, work stress, BMI, salty food preference, physical activity, hypertension, gender, and history of cardiovascular disease or stroke.

conclusionsOur study shows that decision tree analyses can be applied to screen individuals for early diabetes risk without the need for invasive tests. This procedure will be particularly useful in developing regions with high epidemiological risk and poor socioeconomic status, and enable clinical practitioners to rapidly screen patients for increased risk of diabetes. The key features in the tree structure could further facilitate diabetes prevention through targeted community interventions, which can potentially improve early diabetes diagnosis and reduce burdens on the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingData MiningDecision Support TechniquesDecision TreesEarly DiagnosisAdultChinaDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedData miningDiabetesScreening

Identifiers

PMID30866905
PMCPMC6416888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.