ArticleBMC public health2019
Perceived health effects of vaping among Hungarian adult e-cigarette-only and dual users: a cross-sectional internet survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Oral Health: Analytic Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Self-rated health differences between exclusive e-cigarette users and exclusive cigarette smokers: evidence from the 2017-2019 Scottish Health Survey.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- International Expert Consensus on Relevant Health and Functioning Concepts to Assess in Users of Tobacco and Nicotine Products: Delphi Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- E-cigarette use, psychological distress, and daily activity participation among adults in Riyadh.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- A Content Analysis of Behavior Change Techniques Employed in North American Vaping Prevention Interventions.AJPM focus · 2023Article
- Association of dual electronic cigarettes and marijuana use with sleep duration among adults from the United States, NHANES 2015-2018.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Smoking, e-cigarettes and the effect on respiratory symptoms among a population sample of youth: Retrospective cohort study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2023Article
- Content Analysis of Nicotine Poisoning (Nic Sick) Videos on TikTok: Retrospective Observational Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Observational
- Oral health practices and self-reported adverse effects of E-cigarette use among dental students in 11 countries: an online survey.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Knowledge, beliefs, attitude, and practices of E-cigarette use among dental students: A multinational survey.PloS one · 2022Article
- Deleterious Association of Inhalant Use on Sleep Quality during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Health effects of electronic cigarette (e‑cigarette) use on organ systems and its implications for public health.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Review
- Vaping-Related Adverse Events and Perceived Health Improvements: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Daily E-Cigarette Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Oral Hygiene Practices of Hungarian Adult E-Cigarette-Only and Dual Users.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2020Article
- E-cigarette use and its predictors: Results from an online cross-sectional survey in Poland.Tobacco induced diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge about the health effects of e-cigarette use (or vaping) among past and current combustible cigarette users is limited. Several studies have assessed vaping-related adverse events (AEs) and beneficial health effects, however, most studies focused on AEs in general and examined only a few physiological changes that vapers experience. This study aims to explore self-reported AEs and perceived health changes due to e-cigarette use among Hungarian adult e-cigarette-only users (former smokers who switched completely to e-cigarette use) and dual users (smokers who use e-cigarettes and combustible tobacco cigarettes concomitantly).
methodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey of 1042 adult Hungarian e-cigarette users was conducted in 2015. Participants reported AEs and changes in physiological functions since they switched from smoking to e-cigarette use or while dually using e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. Confirmatory factor analysis with covariates was applied to explain perceived health changes due to e-cigarette-only use and dual use.
resultsDual users (17.6%) were significantly more likely to report AEs of vaping than e-cigarette-only users (26.2% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001). Experiencing health improvements were significantly more likely among e-cigarette-only users than for dual users for all surveyed physiological functions. E-cigarette-only users reported larger effects of vaping on sensory, physical functioning, and mental health factors compared to dual users. Self-reported changes in sensory and physical functioning were significantly higher among individuals using e-cigarettes more than a year and people who were past heavy smokers (smoked ≥20 cigarettes per day). Gender was related to sensory improvement only; males reported greater improvement than females.
conclusionsThe majority of e-cigarette-only users reported more perceived beneficial changes in physiological functions and fewer AEs than dual users. Perceived short-term benefits of e-cigarette use may reinforce users despite the uncertainty of long-term health consequences. Health professionals should provide balanced information regarding the possible short- and long-term positive and negative health effects of e-cigarette use during consultations with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.