ArticleBMC cancer2019
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- EANM guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Guideline
- The post-progression survival of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: results from a randomized phase III study in JGOG3017/GCIG.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2020Trial
- Role of Imaging Techniques in Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes by bone metastasis uptake pattern in differentiated thyroid cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Epithelial characteristics of ovarian clear cell carcinoma at single-cell resolution.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithm for preoperative prediction of FIGO stage in ovarian cancer based on clinical features integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic and radiomics features.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of PretreatmentCancers · 2025Article
- Metabolic Reprogramming Shapes the Progression and Therapeutic Landscape of Ovarian Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
- Recognition of pivotal immune genes NR1H4 and IL4R as diagnostic biomarkers in distinguishing ovarian clear cell cancer from high-grade serous cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals immune subtypes and prognostic markers in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT-based quantitative metabolic parameters in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020Article
- Recurrence Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Surgically Treated Recurrent Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institutional Analysis of 45 Cases.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlucose metabolism has been suggested as a therapeutic target in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC). We attempted to clarify
methodsQuantitative metabolic parameters included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Two different methods were employed for defining the threshold SUV to delineate MTV: 1) SUV of 2.5 (designated as MTV); 2) a fixed ratio including 40% (MTV40), 50% (MTV50) and 60% (MTV60) of SUVmax. The Kaplan-Meier model and Cox regression were used in survival analysis.
resultsAmong the 35 patients, platinum-resistant recurrence accounted for 34.3% and the median progression-free survival was 13 months (range, 2-135). Fifteen (42.9%) patients presented with single tumor recurrence, while 51 recurrent lesions were identified, with the most common sites in pelvis (29.4%), followed by lymph node metastases (19.6%) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (15.7%). Except four patients with FDG-inavid tumor, the median SUVmax of the 31 patients with high glucose metabolic activity was 7.10 (range, 3.00-20.60). After a median follow-up of 36.5 months (range, 7-155), 22 patients (64.7%) were dead from disease. The median post-relapse survival (PRS) was 17 months (range, 4-126). Platinum-resistant recurrence, peritoneal carcinomatosis and high TLG60 proved to be negative predicators of overall survival after multivariate analysis.
conclusionsTLG60, platinum-resistant recurrence and peritoneal carcinomatosis were independent negative predicators of overall survival. Whether patients with higher TLG60 required more aggressive treatment warranted further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.