Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866672›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2019

Improving pragmatic clinical trial design using real-world data.

Susan M Shortreed, Carolyn M Rutter, Andrea J Cook, Gregory E Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The Future of Causal Inference.American journal of epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  12. Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan M Shortreed1 Biostatistics Unit, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carolyn M Rutter3 RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Andrea J Cook1 Biostatistics Unit, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gregory E Simon4 Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory SupplementU54AT007748 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2012 to 2017
$15.1M
Pragmatic Trial of Population-based Programs to Prevent Suicide AttemptUH3MH007755 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2014 to 2018
$8.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT007748NIMH NIH HHS UH3 MH007755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPragmatic clinical trials often use automated data sources such as electronic health records, claims, or registries to identify eligible individuals and collect outcome information. A specific advantage that this automated data collection often yields is having data on potential participants when design decisions are being made. We outline how this data can be used to inform trial design.

methodsOur work is motivated by a pragmatic clinical trial evaluating the impact of suicide-prevention outreach interventions on fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts in the 18 months after randomization. We illustrate our recommended approaches for designing pragmatic clinical trials using historical data from the health systems participating in this study. Specifically, we illustrate how electronic health record data can be used to inform the selection of trial eligibility requirements, to estimate the distribution of participant characteristics over the course of the trial, and to conduct power and sample size calculations.

resultsData from 122,873 people with patient health questionnaire (PHQ) responses, recorded in their electronic health records between 1 July 2010 and 31 March 2012, were used to show that the suicide attempt rate in the 18 months following completion of the questionnaire varies by response to item nine of the PHQ. We estimated that the proportion of individuals with a prior recorded elevated PHQ (i.e. history of suicidal ideation) would decrease from approximately 50% at the beginning of a trial to about 5%, 50 weeks later. Using electronic health record data, we conducted simulations to estimate the power to detect a 25% reduction in suicide attempts. Simulation-based power calculations estimated that randomizing 8000 participants per randomization arm would allow 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in the suicide attempt rate in the intervention arm compared to usual care at an alpha rate of 0.05.

conclusionsHistorical data can be used to inform the design of pragmatic clinical trials, a strength of trials that use automated data collection for randomizing participants and assessing outcomes. In particular, realistic sample size calculations can be conducted using real-world data from the health systems in which the trial will be conducted. Data-informed trial design should yield more realistic estimates of statistical power and maximize efficiency of trial recruitment.

Indexed as

Research DesignComputer SimulationElectronic Health RecordsHumansMental HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeSuicide PreventionUnited StatesElectronic medical recordsmental healthpower calculationspragmatic clinical trialsrandomized trial designsample size calculationsstudy designsuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID30866672
PMCPMC6533115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.