ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2019
Improving pragmatic clinical trial design using real-world data.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial Testing Behavioral Economic Implementation Strategies to Improve Tobacco Treatment for Patients With Cancer Who Smoke.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Prescription Digital Therapeutics for Substance Use Disorder in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Implementation Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Characterising the genetic architecture of changes in adiposity during adulthood using electronic health records.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Predicting risk of suicidal behavior from insurance claims data vs. linked data from insurance claims and electronic health records.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- Design, implementation, and inferential issues associated with clinical trials that rely on data in electronic medical records: a narrative review.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Review
- Real-world Application of Racial and Ethnic Imputation and Cohort Balancing Techniques to Deliver Equitable Clinical Trial Recruitment.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Baseline representativeness of patients in clinics enrolled in the PRimary care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) trial: comparison of trial and non-trial clinics in the same health systems.BMC health services research · 2022Observational
- The Future of Causal Inference.American journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Leveraging electronic health record data for clinical trial planning by assessing eligibility criteria's impact on patient count and safety.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Risk of self-harm and overdose after starting buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.General hospital psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPragmatic clinical trials often use automated data sources such as electronic health records, claims, or registries to identify eligible individuals and collect outcome information. A specific advantage that this automated data collection often yields is having data on potential participants when design decisions are being made. We outline how this data can be used to inform trial design.
methodsOur work is motivated by a pragmatic clinical trial evaluating the impact of suicide-prevention outreach interventions on fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts in the 18 months after randomization. We illustrate our recommended approaches for designing pragmatic clinical trials using historical data from the health systems participating in this study. Specifically, we illustrate how electronic health record data can be used to inform the selection of trial eligibility requirements, to estimate the distribution of participant characteristics over the course of the trial, and to conduct power and sample size calculations.
resultsData from 122,873 people with patient health questionnaire (PHQ) responses, recorded in their electronic health records between 1 July 2010 and 31 March 2012, were used to show that the suicide attempt rate in the 18 months following completion of the questionnaire varies by response to item nine of the PHQ. We estimated that the proportion of individuals with a prior recorded elevated PHQ (i.e. history of suicidal ideation) would decrease from approximately 50% at the beginning of a trial to about 5%, 50 weeks later. Using electronic health record data, we conducted simulations to estimate the power to detect a 25% reduction in suicide attempts. Simulation-based power calculations estimated that randomizing 8000 participants per randomization arm would allow 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in the suicide attempt rate in the intervention arm compared to usual care at an alpha rate of 0.05.
conclusionsHistorical data can be used to inform the design of pragmatic clinical trials, a strength of trials that use automated data collection for randomizing participants and assessing outcomes. In particular, realistic sample size calculations can be conducted using real-world data from the health systems in which the trial will be conducted. Data-informed trial design should yield more realistic estimates of statistical power and maximize efficiency of trial recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.