Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866559›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Evaluating the Risk of Epidemic Thunderstorm Asthma: Lessons from Australia.

Sharon L Campbell, Paul D Fox-Hughes, Penelope J Jones, Tomas A Remenyi, Kate Chappell, Christopher J White, Fay H Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Review of the Respiratory Health Burden Attributable to Short-Term Exposure to Pollen.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sharon L CampbellMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. sharon.campbell@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-5372
Paul D Fox-HughesBureau of Meteorology, GPO Box 727, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. paul.fox-hughes@bom.gov.au.
Penelope J JonesMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. penelope.jones@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4880-6711
Tomas A RemenyiAntarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. tom.remenyi@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4145-9323
Kate ChappellMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. kate.chappell@utas.edu.au.
Christopher J WhiteAntarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. chris.white@utas.edu.au.
Fay H JohnstonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia. fay.johnston@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-8678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemic thunderstorm asthma (ETA) is an emerging public health threat in Australia, highlighted by the 2016 event in Melbourne, Victoria, that overwhelmed health services and caused loss of life. However, there is limited understanding of the regional variations in risk. We evaluated the public health risk of ETA in the nearby state of Tasmania by quantifying the frequency of potential ETA episodes and applying a standardized natural disaster risk assessment framework. Using a case⁻control approach, we analyzed emergency presentations in Tasmania's public hospitals from 2002 to 2017. Cases were defined as days when asthma presentations exceeded four standard deviations from the mean, and controls as days when asthma presentations were less than one standard deviation from the mean. Four controls were randomly selected for each case. Independently, a meteorologist identified the dates of potential high-risk thunderstorm events. No case days coincided with thunderstorms during the study period. ETA was assessed as a very low risk to the Tasmanian population, with these findings informing risk prioritization and resource allocation. This approach may be scaled and applied in other settings to determine local ETA risk. Furthermore, the identification of hazards using this method allows for critical analysis of existing public health systems.

Indexed as

WeatherAsthmaAustraliaCase-Control StudiesEpidemicsHospitals, PublicHumansPublic HealthRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTasmaniaasthmahazardpublic healthriskthunderstorm

Identifiers

PMID30866559
PMCPMC6427665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.