ReviewDentistry journal2019
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04354636 (Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation After the Use of Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in the Management of Occlusal Caries of Primary Molars in Preschool Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation After the Use of Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in the Management of Occlusal Caries of Primary Molars in Preschool Children: Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-year clinical and radiographic evaluation of young permanent molars treated with brix 3000 vs. papacárie duo: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer restorations in molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Presumptive Bilirubin-Related Chlorodontia and Developmental Enamel Defects of the Primary Dentition in an Extremely Preterm Infant: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Novel coating materials for glassionomer cement: formulation characteristics, surface adhesion and impact on microhardness.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Acid erosion, surface topography, and fluoride release of glass ionomer cements subjected to erosive challenge.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Article
- Fluoride Release, Recharge, and Mass Stability of Restorative Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Sensory Processing Disorder in Children-Description of the Phenomenon and Practical Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Health Care Package of Services within a Comprehensive PhilHealth Benefit Package.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
- Addition of nisin to high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement: a comparative in vitro study on antibacterial and physical properties.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness and Solubility of Different Combinations of Antibiotic Powders Added to Glass Ionomer Cement: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- In vitro evaluation of some mechanical properties and fluoride release of glass-ionomer cement modified with seashell nanoparticles.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024Article
- Understanding decision making for the use of atraumatic restorative approach based on non-clinical factors by Indian pedodontists - a conjoint analysis.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Expert consensus on early childhood caries management.International journal of oral science · 2022Review
- Twelve-month evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach for class III restorations: An interventional study.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Pediatric Dentistry during Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic: A Paradigm Shift in Treatment Options.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.