Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30866005›Full record

ReviewSeminars in reproductive medicine2018

Child Health: Is It Really Assisted Reproductive Technology that We Need to Be Concerned About?

Edwina H Yeung, Keewan Kim, Alexandra Purdue-Smithe, Griffith Bell, Jessica Zolton, Akhgar Ghassabian, Yassaman Vafai, Sonia L Robinson, Sunni L Mumford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edwina H Yeung
Keewan Kim
Alexandra Purdue-Smithe
Griffith Bell
Jessica Zolton
Akhgar GhassabianDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Yassaman Vafai
Sonia L Robinson
Sunni L Mumford

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns remain about the health of children conceived by infertility treatment. Studies to date have predominantly not identified substantial long-term health effects after accounting for plurality, which is reassuring given the increasing numbers of children conceived by infertility treatment worldwide. However, as technological advances in treatment arise, ongoing studies remain critical for monitoring health effects. To study whether the techniques used in infertility treatment cause health differences, however, remains challenging due to identification of an appropriate comparison group, heterogeneous treatment, and confounding by the underlying causes of infertility. In fact, the factors that are associated with underlying infertility, including parental obesity and other specific male and female factors, may be important independent factors to consider. This review will summarize key methodological considerations in studying children conceived by infertility treatment including the evidence of associations between underlying infertility factors and child health.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMalePregnancyReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30866005
PMCPMC7047653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.