Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865949›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2019

Effect of Obesity on Cognitive Function among School Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sultan Ayoub Meo, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Altuwaym, Rayan Mohammed Alfallaj, Khalid Abdulaziz Alduraibi, Abdullah Mohammed Alhamoudi, Saud Mohammed Alghamdi, Ashfaq Akram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sultan Ayoub MeoDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, sultanmeo@hotmail.com.
Abdulrahman Abdulaziz AltuwaymDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan Mohammed AlfallajDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Abdulaziz AlduraibiDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Mohammed AlhamoudiDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saud Mohammed AlghamdiDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashfaq AkramDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildhood obesity contributes to the risk of numerous health problems and has become a major global health concern. This study aimed to establish the association between obesity and cognitive function among healthy school adolescents.

methodsThis study was carried out by taking school adolescents (n = 400) from June 2016 to December 2017. The mean age of the participants was 13.93 ± 0.81 years. The students were divided into group A (obese, n = 223) and B (non-obese, n = 177). Cognitive functions were recorded as per study tool of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).

resultsSeverely obese students showed a significant delay in cognitive functions as compared to students with normal BMI. Attention Switching Task (AST)-Latency among students with normal BMI was 647.88 ± 137.59 compared to the students with high BMI (685.08 ± 115.92, p = 0.05), AST-Incongruent was 680.78 ± 142.07 versus 726.76 ± 122.31 (p = 0.02), AST-Percent correct trials was 84.31 ± 10.45 versus 78.09 ± 14.87 (p = 0.001), and Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED) Total errors among students with normal BMI was 33.93 ± 21.53 compared to the students with high BMI (42.86 ± 37.27, p = 0.03).

conclusionCognitive functions including AST-Latency, AST-Incongruent, AST-Percent correct trials, and IED Total errors were significantly weakened in markedly obese students. Significant impairments in their cognitive functions, especially attention, retention, intelligence, and cognitive flexibility, were observed. The findings of this study emphasize the need to involve school adolescents in physical activities to reduce body weight in order to have cognitive functions within normal range and also to minimize obesity-associated complications.

Indexed as

StudentsAdolescentChildCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansIdeal Body WeightMaleNeuropsychological TestsObesity, MorbidPediatric ObesitySchoolsThinnessCognitive functionObesitySchool children

Identifiers

PMID30865949
PMCPMC6547262
OpenAlexW2921031707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.