Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865777›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Disconnected: a survey of users and nonusers of telehealth and their use of primary care.

Winston R Liaw, Anuradha Jetty, Megan Coffman, Stephen Petterson, Miranda A Moore, Gayathri Sridhar, Aliza S Gordon, Judith J Stephenson, Wallace Adamson, Andrew W Bazemore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Socioeconomic Determinants of Remote Patient Monitoring Implementation Among Rural and Urban Hospitals.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Remote Management of Osteoporosis.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Winston R LiawRobert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Anuradha JettyRobert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Megan CoffmanRobert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Stephen PettersonRobert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Miranda A MooreDepartment of Family & Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Gayathri SridharHealthCore, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Aliza S GordonHealthCore, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Judith J StephensonHealthCore, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Wallace AdamsonLiveHealth Online, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Andrew W BazemoreRobert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Washington Center · USWilmington University · USEmory University · USOhioHealth · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to assess awareness, perceptions, and value of telehealth in primary care from the perspective of patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, Web-based survey of adults with access to telehealth services who visited healthcare providers for any of the 20 most-commonly seen diagnoses during telehealth visits. Three groups were studied: registered users (RUs) of telehealth had completed a LiveHealth Online (a health plan telehealth service provider) visit, registered nonusers (RNUs) registered for LiveHealth Online but had not conducted a visit, and nonregistered nonusers (NRNUs) completed neither step.

resultsOf 32 831 patients invited, 3219 (9.8%) responded and 766 met eligibility criteria and completed surveys: 390 (51%) RUs, 117 (15%) RNUs, and 259 (34%) NRNUs. RUs were least likely to have a primary care usual source of care (65.6% vs 78.6% for RNUs vs 80.0% for NRNUs; P < .001). Nearly half (46.8%) of RUs were unable to get an appointment with their doctor, and 34.8% indicated that their doctor's office was closed. Among the 3 groups, RUs were most likely to be employed (89.5% vs 88.9% vs 82.2%; P = .007), have post-high school education (94.4% vs 93.2% vs 86.5%; P = .003), and live in urban areas (81.0% vs 69.2% vs 76.0%; P = .021).

conclusionsTelehealth users reported that they relied on live video for enhanced access and were less connected to primary care than nonusers were. Telehealth may expand service access but risks further fragmentation of care and undermining of the primary care function absent better coordination and information sharing with usual sources of patients' care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedComputersCross-Sectional StudiesHealth StatusHumansInternetMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareSmartphoneSocioeconomic FactorsTelemedicineaccess to health careprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30865777
PMCPMC7787350
OpenAlexW2921779677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.