Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Migratory goose arrival time plays a larger role in influencing forage quality than advancing springs in an Arctic coastal wetland.

Karen H Beard, Ryan T Choi, A Joshua Leffler, Lindsay G Carlson, Katharine C Kelsey, Joel A Schmutz, Jeffrey M Welker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mowing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen H BeardDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University and the Ecology Center, Logan, UT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4997-2495
Ryan T ChoiDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University and the Ecology Center, Logan, UT, United States of America.
A Joshua LefflerDepartment of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States of America.
Lindsay G CarlsonDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University and the Ecology Center, Logan, UT, United States of America.
Katharine C KelseyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska-Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-8538
Joel A SchmutzUS Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, United States of America.
Jeffrey M WelkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska-Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With warmer springs, herbivores migrating to Arctic breeding grounds may experience phenological mismatches between their energy demands and the availability of high quality forage. Yet, how the timing of the start of the season and herbivore arrival influences forage quality is often unknown. In coastal western Alaska, approximately one million migratory geese arrive each spring to breed, where foliar %N and C:N ratios are linked to gosling survival and population growth. We conducted a three-year experiment where we manipulated the start of the growing season using warming chambers and grazing times using captive Pacific black brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) to examine how the timing of these events influences the quality of an important forage species. Our results suggest that grazing timing plays a much greater role than an advanced growing season in determining forage quality. All top models included grazing timing, and suggested that compared to typical grazing timing, early grazing significantly reduced foliar %C by 6% and C:N ratios by 16%, while late goose grazing significantly reduced foliar %N by 15% and increased foliar C:N ratios by 21%. While second-ranking top models included the effect of season, the advanced growing season effect was not significant and only reduced %N by 4%, increased %C by <1%, and increased C:N ratios by 5% compared to an ambient growing season. In summary, in years where geese arrive early, they will consume higher quality forage when they arrive and throughout the season, while in years that geese arrive late they will consume lower quality forage when they arrive and for the remainder of the season. When the growing season starts has only a minor influence on this pattern. Our findings suggest that cues determining migration and arrival times to breeding areas are important factors influencing forage quality for geese in western Alaska.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationAnimalsArctic RegionsFemaleGeeseLinear ModelsMaleNatural SpringsSeasonsWetlands

Identifiers

PMID30865725
PMCPMC6415786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.