Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865653›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Fabricating retinal pigment epithelial cell sheets derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells in an automated closed culture system for regenerative medicine.

Erino Matsumoto, Naoshi Koide, Hiroko Hanzawa, Masaharu Kiyama, Mari Ohta, Junichi Kuwabara, Shizu Takeda, Masayo Takahashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Journal of biotechnology and biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cell Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fabrication of tissue-engineered cell sheets by automated cell culture equipment.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erino MatsumotoCenter for Exploratory Research, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Naoshi KoideLaboratory for Retinal Regeneration, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroko HanzawaCenter for Exploratory Research, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masaharu KiyamaCenter for Exploratory Research, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Mari OhtaCenter for Exploratory Research, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Junichi KuwabaraPlanning and Development Division, Sanplatec Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Shizu TakedaCenter for Exploratory Research, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6616-8402
Masayo TakahashiLaboratory for Retinal Regeneration, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Hitachi (Japan) · JPRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative medicine has received a lot of attention as a novel strategy for injuries and diseases that are difficult to cure using current techniques. Cell production, which is vital for regenerative medicine, has undergone remarkable progress via breakthroughs in developmental biology and tissue engineering; currently, cell production requires numerous experimental operators performing manual, small-scale cell cultures. Other major obstacles for cell production and regenerative medicine include the variable quality of products based on the experimental procedure, the skills of operators, the level of labor required for production, and costs. Technological developments are required to overcome this, including automation instead of manual culture. Age-related macular regeneration (AMD) is a refractory ocular disease that causes severe deterioration in central vision due to senescence in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Recently, we performed an autologous transplantation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived RPE cell sheets and started clinical research on allografts from RPE cell suspensions differentiated from iPS cells. The use of regenerative therapies for AMD using iPS cell-derived RPE is expected to become more widespread. In the present study, human iPS cell-derived RPE cells were cultured to form RPE cell sheets using equipment with a closed culture module. The quality of the automated cultured RPE cell sheets was confirmed by comparing their morphological and biological properties with those of manually generated RPE cell sheets. As a result, machine-cultured RPE sheets displayed the same quality as manually cultured RPE sheets, showing that iPS cell-derived RPE cell sheets were successfully cultured by an automated process.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedEye ProteinsFeasibility StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMacular DegenerationNerve Growth FactorsPigment Epithelium-Derived FactorRegenerative MedicineRetinal Pigment EpitheliumSerpinsTissue EngineeringVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AEye ProteinsNerve Growth FactorsPigment Epithelium-Derived FactorSerpinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30865653
PMCPMC6415881
OpenAlexW2920832268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.