Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865645›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Differences between two populations of bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with variable measurements of laboratory susceptibilities to Bt toxins exposed to non-Bt and Bt cottons in large field cages.

Nathan S Little, Blake H Elkins, R Michelle Mullen, Omaththage P Perera, Katherine A Parys, K Clint Allen, Deborah L Boykin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan S LittleSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1105-3733
Blake H ElkinsSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.
R Michelle MullenSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.
Omaththage P PereraSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0643-0066
Katherine A ParysSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-3687
K Clint AllenSouthern Insect Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.
Deborah L BoykinJamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, Mississippi, United States of America.
Southern Research Station · USMississippi Delta Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting variable laboratory measurements of Helicoverpa zea Boddie susceptibility to toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) has been challenging due to a lack of clear evidence to document declining field control. Research that links laboratory measurements of susceptibility to survival on Bt crops is vital for accurate characterization and any subsequent response to the occurrence of an implied H. zea resistance event. In this study, H. zea survival and the resultant damage to plant fruiting structures of non-Bt, Bollgard II, and Bollgard III cottons from two insect colonies with differing levels of laboratory susceptibility to Bt toxins were evaluated in large field cages. Laboratory bioassays revealed resistance ratios of 2.04 and 622.14 between the two H. zea colonies for Dipel DF and Cry1Ac, respectively. Differences between the two H. zea colonies measured via bioassays with Bollgard II and Bollgard III cotton leaf tissue in the laboratory were not statistically discernable. However, there was 17.6% and 5.3% lower larval mortality in Bollgard II and Bollgard III for the feral relative to the laboratory colony of H. zea, respectively. Although H. zea larval numbers in cages infested with the laboratory susceptible colony did not differ between the two Bt cottons, there were fewer larvae per 25 plants in Bollgard III than in Bollgard II cotton in cages containing tolerant insects. Cages infested with tolerant H. zea moths had higher numbers of total larvae than those containing the laboratory susceptible colony in both Bollgard II and Bollgard III cottons. Bollgard II and Bollgard III cottons received 77.4% and 82.7% more total damage to total plant fruiting structures in cages infested with tolerant insects relative to those containing the laboratory susceptible colony. The damage inflicted to fruiting structures on Bollgard III cotton by a feral H. zea colony with decreased measurements of laboratory susceptibility to Dipel DF and Cry1Ac indicate that the addition of Vip3A to third generation Bt cottons may not provide sufficient control in situations where infestations levels are high.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsGossypiumPest Control, BiologicalPlants, Genetically ModifiedZea maysAnimalsLepidopteraBacterial ProteinsEndotoxins

Identifiers

PMID30865645
PMCPMC6415783
OpenAlexW2920918289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.