Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865643›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Structural similarity, characterization of Poly Ethylene Glycol linkage and identification of product related variants in biosimilar pegfilgrastim.

Rakesh Shekhawat, Chintan Kumar Shah, Akash Patel, Sankaranarayanan Srinivasan, Poonam Kapoor, Suvaskumar Patel, Sharwan Kumar, Sandeep Sonar, Namrata More, Manasvi Joshi and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging for the analysis of biopharmaceuticals.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rakesh ShekhawatAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Chintan Kumar ShahAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Akash PatelAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sankaranarayanan SrinivasanAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Poonam KapoorBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Suvaskumar PatelBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-8828
Sharwan KumarAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sandeep SonarAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Namrata MoreAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Manasvi JoshiAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Jatin PatelAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Milan VachhaniBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Bhargav Prasad KodagantiBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Upasana ChoavatiyaBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Arabhi PushpajaBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Shubhangi ArgadeCMC Technical writing team, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nidhi NuwalBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Manish KumarBiocharacterization Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sridevi KhambhampatyAnalytical Development Laboratory, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Biopharma Division), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2996-0235
Intas Pharmaceuticals (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of biosimilars requires demonstration of biosimilarity, which rests on the base of thorough analytical characterization of the biosimilar product. In addition to demonstration of biosimilarity, the product related impurities need to be thoroughly characterized and controlled at minimal levels. Pegylation of peptides and proteins creates significant challenges for detailed structural characterization, such as PEG (Poly Ethylene Glycol) heterogeneity, site of addition and number of attached pegylated moieties. A combination of several methods including circular dichroism, FTIR (Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy), fluorescence spectroscopy, DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry), 1D and 2D NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance), Edman degradation and peptide mapping by LC-MS (Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry) were used for characterization of N-terminally pegylated filgrastim. Product related impurities such as oxidized, reduced, deamidated, dipegylated variants and monopegylated positional isomers have been characterized in detail using various HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) based methods and LC-MS techniques. The functional characterization in terms of receptor binding and cell proliferation assay was conducted for the similarity assessment and the potential impact of the product variants on the in vitro biological activity has also been assessed. In summary, this study presents, for the first time, a detailed structural and molecular level characterization of a biosimilar pegfilgrastim providing a strong base for the demonstration of overall biosimilarity of the product with the innovator product.

Indexed as

Biological AssayBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsFilgrastimPolyethylene GlycolsCell LineCell ProliferationHumansBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsFilgrastimpegfilgrastimPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID30865643
PMCPMC6415886
OpenAlexW2921372552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.