Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865305›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Assessing Campus Alcohol Policies: Measuring Accessibility, Clarity, and Effectiveness.

David H Jernigan, Kelsey Shields, Molly Mitchell, Amelia M Arria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing for Adolescent Drinking in Denmark.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David H JerniganDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management , Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0789-6917
Kelsey ShieldsNational Opinion Research Center , University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Molly MitchellJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.
Amelia M ArriaDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health , Center on Young Adult Health and Development, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-9265

Funding

Personalized Health Assessment Related to Medications (Project PHARM) SupplementU01DA040219 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ARRIA, AMELIA M, CIMINI, MARIA DOLORES · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Behavioral Health Administration, Maryland Department of Health M00B8400094Behavioral Health Administration, Maryland Department of Health M00B9400100NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA040219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive alcohol consumption poses significant hazards to health and safety on college campuses. While substantial research exists regarding effective policies for preventing alcohol-related problems in the communities surrounding campuses, on-campus alcohol policies have received far less attention.

methodsOfficial campus alcohol policies (CAPs) were retrieved from the websites of the 15 member schools of the Maryland Collaborative to Reduce College Drinking and Related Problems, a voluntary statewide collaborative. CAPs were assessed for accessibility, clarity, and effectiveness. In addition to assessing whether campuses were in compliance with federal regulations for comprehensiveness of policies, a measure of likely policy effectiveness was developed through the use of 2 Delphi panels drawing on alcohol policy researchers and on-campus and community practitioners, respectively. The panels rated 35 potential policies and 13 possible sanctions; lists of policies and sanctions were compiled primarily from what was already in existence at 1 or more member schools.

resultsFor most campuses, the CAPs could be located within 30 seconds, but tended to be spread across multiple web pages. Language used to communicate the policies tended to be complex and above the reading level of someone with a high school education. At least half of the schools had less than half of the possible policies rated most or somewhat effective by the Delphi panels. Schools were more likely to employ the most effective sanctions, but somewhat and ineffective sanctions were also not uncommon.

conclusionsCAPs are an important element in reducing negative consequences of alcohol consumption on college campuses. A higher level of research scrutiny is warranted to understand the extent to which CAPs are associated with excessive drinking, but this research describes an evidence- and expert-informed assessment approach that colleges can use to regularly analyze and update their CAPS.

Indexed as

Organizational PolicyAdolescentAlcohol Drinking in CollegeDelphi TechniqueFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternetMaleMarylandStudent Health ServicesTreatment OutcomeUniversitiesYoung AdultAlcohol PoliciesCollege CampusEffectivenessYoung People

Identifiers

PMID30865305
PMCPMC6502686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.