SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06197100 (Effectiveness of Supportive Care Training Given to Mothers of Babies With Infant Colic), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Supportive Care Training Given to Mothers of Babies With Infant Colic: Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of probiotic on anxiety and depression symptoms in pregnant and lactating women and microbiota of infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Probiotics for preventing and treating infant regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Probiotics for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Probiotics for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of common interventions for the treatment of infantile colic: a systematic review of reviews and guidelines.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Parent training programmes for managing infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Osteopathic treatment of infants with infantile colic/excessive crying: a prospective, multicentric, randomized controlled trial and nested observational trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Oral lactase for infantile colic: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2022Trial
- Review
- The Gut in Early Life-Postnatal Challenges.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk factors and long-term outcomes of infantile colic: A nationwide population-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Efficacy of the Administration ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2026Article
- [Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Among Infants Aged 0 to 9 Months With Gastrointestinal Discomfort in China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Exploring Manual Interventions for Infantile Colic: A Scoping Review of the Evidence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Systematic Evaluation of How Indicators of Inequity and Disadvantage Are Measured and Reported in Population Health Evidence Syntheses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Article
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of two novel human-derivedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfantile colic is typically defined as full-force crying for at least three hours per day, on at least three days per week, for at least three weeks. Infantile colic affects a large number of infants and their families worldwide. Its symptoms are broad and general, and while not indicative of disease, may represent a serious underlying condition in a small percentage of infants who may need a medical assessment. Probiotics are live microorganisms that alter the microflora of the host and provide beneficial health effects. The most common probiotics used are of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus. There is growing evidence to suggest that intestinal flora in colicky infants differ from those in healthy infants, and it is suggested that probiotics can redress this balance and provide a healthier intestinal microbiota landscape. The low cost and easy availability of probiotics makes them a potential prophylactic solution to reduce the incidence and prevalence of infantile colic.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic probiotics in preventing or reducing severity of infantile colic. SEARCH
methodsIn January 2018 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, 10 other databases and two trials registers. In addition, we handsearched the abstracts of relevant meetings, searched reference lists, ran citation searches of included studies, and contacted authors and experts in the field, including the manufacturers of probiotics, to identify unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised control trials (RCTs) of newborn infants less than one month of age without the diagnosis of infantile colic at recruitment. We included any probiotic, alone or in combination with a prebiotic (also known as synbiotics), versus no intervention, another intervention(s) or placebo, where the focus of the study was the effect of the intervention on infantile colic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures of Cochrane. MAIN
resultsOur search yielded 3284 records, and of these, we selected 21 reports for full-text review. Six studies with 1886 participants met our inclusion criteria, comparing probiotics with placebo. Two studies examined Lactobacillus reuteri DSM, two examined multi-strain probiotics, one examined Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and one examined Lactobacillus paracasei and Bifidobacterium animalis. Two studies began probiotics during pregnancy and continued administering them to the baby after birth.We considered the risk of bias for randomisation as low for all six trials; for allocation concealment as low in two studies and unclear in four others. All studies were blinded, and at low risk of attrition and reporting bias.A random-effects meta-analysis of three studies (1148 participants) found no difference between the groups in relation to occurrence of new cases of colic: risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.19; low-certainty evidence; I AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no clear evidence that probiotics are more effective than placebo at preventing infantile colic; however, daily crying time appeared to reduce with probiotic use compared to placebo. There were no clear differences in adverse effects.We are limited in our ability to draw conclusions by the certainty of the evidence, which we assessed as being low across all three outcomes, meaning that we are not confident that these results would not change with the addition of further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.