Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865133›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2019

Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.

Michael Ahdoot, Amir H Lebastchi, Baris Turkbey, Bradford Wood, Peter A Pinto

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04113811 nacompletednot on this map

Microwave Needle Thermoablation for Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Under the Guidance of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Organbased Tracking: A Phase 2 Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2019 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsProstate CancerArmsBiomedical TATO3® Microwave needle thermoablation device (Koelis, Grenoble, France)
NCT05241236 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Office Based MRI/Ultrasound Guided Prostate Cancer Ablation: Outcomes Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUrological Research Network, LLCRan2020 to 2038Enrolled5,000ConditionsNeoplasms Prostate, Cancer of the ProstateArmsImage Fusion (MR/US) Software Registration Guided Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Focal therapy for prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current Status of Cryoablation in Prostate Cancer Management.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael AhdootUrologic Oncology Branch (UOB), National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Amir H LebastchiUrologic Oncology Branch (UOB), National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Institute of Health.
Bradford WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, & Interventional Radiology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch (UOB), National Cancer Institute (NCI).
National Cancer Institute · MYCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRadical treatments for prostate cancer are associated with significant morbidity, including incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Advances in the field of prostate MRI and desire to reduce treatment morbidities have led to a rapid growth in focal treatments for prostate cancer. Here, we review novel focal prostate cancer treatments and their associated recent clinical data, with a particular focus on data reported within the last 24 months. RECENT

findingsHigh-intensity focal ultrasound, focal laser ablation, irreversible electroporation, focal cryotherapy, and photodynamic therapy have been used as treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer treatment. Despite the great variety of treatment techniques, each of these modalities is characterized by a significant rate of prostate cancer persistence within treatment zones (6-50%) and the presence of residual cancer within the prostate on rebiopsy (24-49%). These treatments, however, are associated with very low rates of high-grade complications, rare incontinence, and only mild or transient reductions in erectile function. The most common adverse events are urinary tract infections, hematuria, and urinary retention. SUMMARY: Prostate cancer focal therapy is an attractive option for well-selected patients because of its low complication profile; however, long-term oncologic outcome is still lacking and early recurrence rates are high, limiting the ability of most urologic associations from endorsing its routine use.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCryotherapyElectroporationHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansLaser TherapyMalePhotochemotherapyProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30865133
PMCPMC6465079
OpenAlexW2922760520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.