Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30865008›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2019

Novel advances in monitoring and therapeutic approaches in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

James L Mitchell, Susan P Mollan, Vivek Vijay, Alexandra J Sinclair

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. New Options (or not) for Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James L MitchellMetabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham.
Susan P MollanBirmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
Vivek VijayMetabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham.
Alexandra J SinclairMetabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham.
University of Birmingham · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K015184/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe current article appraises the recent developments in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), with particular attention to novel therapeutic avenues and advanced clinical assessment and monitoring with optical coherence tomography and telemetric intracranial pressure devices. RECENT

findingsThe incidence of IIH is increasing. The first consensus guidelines for IIH have been published detailing investigation and management algorithms for adult IIH. Improved understanding, clinical assessment and monitoring are emerging with the use of optical coherence tomography. Intracranial pressure telemetry is providing unique insights into the physiology of raised intracranial pressure in IIH. There are now an increasing number of ongoing clinical trials evaluating weight loss methods and novel targeted therapies, such as 11ß-HSD1 inhibition and Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. SUMMARY: Several studies are evaluating new therapies for IIH. Monitoring techniques are advancing, aiding diagnosis and allowing the clinician to accurately evaluate changes in papilloedema and intracranial pressure.

Indexed as

HumansIntracranial HypertensionMonitoring, PhysiologicPseudotumor CerebriTelemedicineTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID30865008
PMCPMC6522204
OpenAlexW2921042390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.