ArticleOncology reports2019
Non‑covalent proteasome inhibitor PI‑1840 induces apoptosis and autophagy in osteosarcoma cells.
Article in Oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-covalent proteasome inhibitor PI1840 suppresses osteoclastogenesis and prevents LPS-induced osteolysis in mice.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of autophagy in the diagnosis and treatment of osteosarcoma: a bibliometric analysis (2007-2023).Cancer biology & therapy · 2025Article
- Ubiquitination regulates autophagy in cancer: simple modifications, promising targets.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Update of cellular responses to the efferocytosis of necroptosis and pyroptosis.Cell division · 2023Review
- Review
- Pyroptosis: mechanisms and diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Peiminine Induces G0/G1-Phase Arrest, Apoptosis, and AutophagyFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the predominant form of primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents. Although the combination of chemotherapy and modified surgical therapy leads to marked improvements in the survival rate, the therapeutic outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Therefore, the identification of novel drugs with higher efficacy and fewer side‑effects is urgently required. Proteasome inhibitors have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of certain cancers, although none of them are directed against OS. Non‑covalent proteasome inhibitors, such as PI‑1840, are superior to covalent ones in numerous respects in view of their chemical structure; however, to date, no studies have been published on the effects of non‑covalent proteasome inhibitors on OS cells. In the present study, the antineoplastic effects of PI‑1840 were systematically evaluated in the OS cell lines, MG‑63 and U2‑OS. Cell viability and morphological changes were assessed by Cell Counting Kit‑8 (CCK‑8) and live/dead assays. The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry (FCM) and western blot analysis (assessing the levels of the proteins p21, p27, and the tyrosine kinase, WEE1). The extent of cell apoptosis and autophagy were assessed by FCM, western blot analysis [of the apoptosis‑associated proteins, microtubule‑associated protein 1 light chain 3 α (LC3) and Beclin1], and mRFP‑GFP‑LC3 adenovirus transfection assay. Transwell and wound healing assays, and western blot analysis of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)2 and 9 were performed to preliminarily evaluate the migration and invasion capability of the cells. In the present study, our results revealed that PI‑1840 inhibited the proliferation of OS cells and induced apoptosis, partly due to attenuation of the nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) pathway. In addition, PI‑1840‑induced autophagy was detected, and inhibiting the autophagy of the OS cells led to an increase in the survival rate of the U2‑OS cells rather than of the MG‑63 cells. Furthermore, PI‑1840 attenuated the migration and invasion capabilities of the OS cells. In conclusion, the present study revealed PI‑1840 to be a promising drug for the treatment of OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.