ReviewJournal of fish biology2019
An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes.
Review in Journal of fish biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 393 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurobehavioral Alterations from Noise Exposure in Animals: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- An underwater acoustic dataset of anthropogenic noise in Lake Balaton, Hungary.Data in brief · 2026Article
- The cost of construction noise: A case study on acoustic environment alteration and survival in pupfish (Cyprinodon variegatus).Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Autonomous cameras reveal larval reef fish responses to acoustic enrichment and lunar phase.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Physiological effects of anthropogenic sound on aquatic animals: where are we and what is next?The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Review
- A Reproducible Method to Evaluate Sublethal Acoustic Stress in Aquatic Invertebrates Using Oxidative Biomarkers.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Hearing thresholds in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax): new insights into auditory sensitivity.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Impacts of vessel noise on Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) spawning choruses in Saint Andrew Bay, Florida, U.S.A.PloS one · 2026Article
- Complex Sound Discrimination in Zebrafish: Auditory Learning Within a Novel "Go/Go" Decision-Making Paradigm.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Zooplankton mortality and distribution around a seismic survey.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Approaching merchant ships elicit behavioral changes in Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) in the St. Lawrence River, Canada.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
- Boat Noise Increases the Oxygen Consumption Rate of the Captive Juvenile Large Yellow Croaker,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Responses to sound in three Centrarchid species: Do heterospecific interactions change behavior?Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
- Avoidance behaviours of farmed Atlantic salmon (Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Autonomous wave gliders as a tool to characterize delphinid habitats along the Florida Atlantic coast.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- The effects of environmental changes on the endocrine regulation of feeding in fishes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Fish responses to underwater sounds depend on auditory adaptations: An experimental test of the effect of motorboat sounds on the fish community of a large fluvial lake.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- First photon-counting detector computed tomography in the living crocodile: a 3D-Imaging study with special reference to amphibious hearing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- First basin scale spatial-temporal characterization of underwater sound in the Mediterranean Sea.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byNoisy waters.2019
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fishes use a variety of sensory systems to learn about their environments and to communicate. Of the various senses, hearing plays a particularly important role for fishes in providing information, often from great distances, from all around these animals. This information is in all three spatial dimensions, often overcoming the limitations of other senses such as vision, touch, taste and smell. Sound is used for communication between fishes, mating behaviour, the detection of prey and predators, orientation and migration and habitat selection. Thus, anything that interferes with the ability of a fish to detect and respond to biologically relevant sounds can decrease survival and fitness of individuals and populations. Since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, there has been a growing increase in the noise that humans put into the water. These anthropogenic sounds are from a wide range of sources that include shipping, sonars, construction activities (e.g., wind farms, harbours), trawling, dredging and exploration for oil and gas. Anthropogenic sounds may be sufficiently intense to result in death or mortal injury. However, anthropogenic sounds at lower levels may result in temporary hearing impairment, physiological changes including stress effects, changes in behaviour or the masking of biologically important sounds. The intent of this paper is to review the potential effects of anthropogenic sounds upon fishes, the potential consequences for populations and ecosystems and the need to develop sound exposure criteria and relevant regulations. However, assuming that many readers may not have a background in fish bioacoustics, the paper first provides information on underwater acoustics, with a focus on introducing the very important concept of particle motion, the primary acoustic stimulus for all fishes, including elasmobranchs. The paper then provides background material on fish hearing, sound production and acoustic behaviour. This is followed by an overview of what is known about effects of anthropogenic sounds on fishes and considers the current guidelines and criteria being used world-wide to assess potential effects on fishes. Most importantly, the paper provides the most complete summary of the effects of anthropogenic noise on fishes to date. It is also made clear that there are currently so many information gaps that it is almost impossible to reach clear conclusions on the nature and levels of anthropogenic sounds that have potential to cause changes in animal behaviour, or even result in physical harm. Further research is required on the responses of a range of fish species to different sound sources, under different conditions. There is a need both to examine the immediate effects of sound exposure and the longer-term effects, in terms of fitness and likely impacts upon populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.