Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30864090›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2019

Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial.

V Panchal, G Jeevanandan, E M G Subramanian

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03964766 (Postoperative Pain Following Pulpectomy of Primary Molars With Rotary Instrumentation Versus Manual Instrumentation), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03964766 naunknown statusnot on this map

Postoperative Pain Following Pulpectomy of Primary Molars With Rotary Instrumentation Versus Manual Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled42ConditionsChronic, InfectionArmsRotary instrumentation, Hand instrumentation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Comparative evaluation of volumetric changes following rotary and hand files' canal preparation of primary maxillary canine: an in vitro nano-CT analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V PanchalDepartment of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Poonamalee High Road, Vellapanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India. veerale60193@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-764X
G JeevanandanDepartment of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Poonamalee High Road, Vellapanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India.
E M G SubramanianDepartment of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Poonamalee High Road, Vellapanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600077, India.
Saveetha University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S in primary teeth.

methodAll 4-6-year-old children were invited and 69 agreed to participate. The participants were randomly divided and distributed for instrumentation with K-file (Group 1), H-file (Group 2) and rotary Kedo-S files (Group 3). After completion of root canal procedure, the post-operative pain was evaluated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h using modified Wong-Baker pain scale and compared between the groups.

resultsPost-operative pain between three groups at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h was compared using Chi square test. There was decreased post-operative pain with Kedo-S rotary files as compared to other two groups (P value < 0.001). The post-operative pain decreased after 12 h for all the groups with no pain at 24, 48 and 72 h intervals.

conclusionPaediatric rotary files Kedo-S showed significantly less post-operative pain as compared to K-file and H-file at 6 h and 12 h intervals. However, follow-up interval of 24, 48 and 72 h showed no significant difference between the rotary and hand file groups.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal PreparationChildChild, PreschoolDental InstrumentsHumansRoot Canal TherapyTooth, DeciduousH-fileKedo-SK-filePost-operative painPrimary teeth

Identifiers

PMID30864090
OpenAlexW2921441662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.