Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30864070›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Accuracy of the use of radiographic visibility of root pulp in the mandibular third molar as a maturity marker at age thresholds of 18 and 21.

Nursel Akkaya, H Özge Yılancı, Hatice Boyacıoğlu, Dinçer Göksülük, Gökhan Özkan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. OlzeJournal of forensic dental sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nursel AkkayaDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100 Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey. ynursel@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-1138
H Özge YılancıDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, İzmir Democracy University, İzmir, Turkey.
Hatice BoyacıoğluDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100 Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Dinçer GöksülükDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Gökhan ÖzkanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of the radiographic visibility of root pulp in mandibular third molars has been suggested as an alternative method for estimation of legal age threshold in living individuals when the root apices are mature. Here, we assessed the accuracy of this method for age thresholds of 18 and 21 years. A sample of 463 panoramic radiographs of individuals aged between 16 and 34 years was examined. The root pulp visibility of the mandibular third molars was scored; the stages ranged from 0 to 3. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to select optimal cut-offs for 18- and 21-year-old thresholds. As prognostic predictors, the selected cut-offs were stages 1 and 2 for the 18- and 21-year-old thresholds of both sexes, respectively. For the 18-year-old threshold, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.829, 83.1% and 66.7% in females; and 0.930, 89.4% and 90.9% in males, respectively. For the 21-year-old threshold, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.874, 72.8% and 92.0% in females; and 0.906, 85.5% and 88.2% in males, respectively. The accuracy of the method for estimating the 18- and 21-year-old thresholds ranged from moderate to high. Therefore, the method must be used in conjunction with other age estimation methods, especially to predict whether a female has reached 18 years of age.

Indexed as

Radiography, PanoramicAdolescentAdultAge Determination by TeethData CollectionDental PulpFemaleForensic DentistryHumansMaleMandibleMolar, ThirdROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTooth RootYoung AdultAdult childrenAge assessmentDental pulp/diagnostic imagingForensic dentistryPanoramicRadiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.