Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30864049›Full record

SynthesisReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2019

Primary tumors of the posterior pituitary: A systematic review.

Fernando Guerrero-Pérez, Agustina Pia Marengo, Noemi Vidal, Pedro Iglesias, Carles Villabona

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Intraventricular pituicytoma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando Guerrero-PérezDepartment of Endocrinology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. fguerrerop@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Agustina Pia MarengoDepartment of Endocrinology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Noemi VidalDepartment of Pathology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro IglesiasDepartment of Endocrinology, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Calle Manuel de Falla, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Carles VillabonaDepartment of Endocrinology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, the World Health Organization established that pituicytoma, granular cell tumor (GCT), spindle cell oncocytoma (SCO) and sellar ependymomas (SE) are posterior pituitary tumors (PPT). They probably arise from the pituicytes and may constitute a unique histopathological entity. We carried out a systematic review using PubMed's database. A total of 266 patients with pathological diagnosis of PPT (135 pituicytomas, 69 GCT, 47 SCO, 8 SE and 7 mixed histology tumors) were analyzed. Gender distribution was identical and median age at diagnosis was 48 ± 21.8 years. Main presentation symptoms were visual disorders (n = 142; 58.1%), headache (n = 99; 40.5%), hypopituitarism (n = 84; 34.4%), hypercortisolism (n = 10; 4.1%), polyuriapolydipsia (n = 6; 2.4%) and acromegaly features (n = 5; 2.0%). On MRI, 122 (47.6%) patients showed sellar with suprasellar extension masses, 67 (23.1%) were suprasellar and 63 (24.6%) exclusively sellar. Median tumor size was 22.0 ± 14.2 mm. Two hundred sixty four patients underwent surgery, transphenoidal access was selected in 132 (64.4%) and craniotomy in 58 (28.3%). Complications were hypopituitarism (n = 70; 42.1%), diabetes insipidus (n = 55; 33.1%) and hemorrhage (n = 50; 30.1%). Tumor persisted in 93 patients (45.6%) and recurred in 13 (6.4%). Regarding comparison between main types of PPT, SCO patients were diagnosed later (60.0 vs 47.0 vs 47.0 years, p = 0.023), the tumor was larger 25.0 mm [10.8] vs 20.0 mm [14.2] vs 2.0 mm [15.0] and they were frequently sellar with suprasellar extension tumors (71.7% vs 46.2% vs 32.8%, p = 0.003) compared to pituicytoma and GCT. In conclusion, PPT are rare tumors and have been misdiagnosed mainly as non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Different types of PPT share similar epidemiology, clinical manifestations and surgical outcomes. Surgery is the only curative option but complications and subtotal resection are common.

Indexed as

AnimalsGranular Cell TumorHumansPituitary NeoplasmsGranular cell tumors of the neurohypophysisNeurohypophysisPituicytomaPosterior pituitary tumorsSpindle cell oncocytoma

Identifiers

PMID30864049
OpenAlexW2921116448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.