Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863991›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2019

Pharmacological Manipulation of Trk, p75NTR, and NGF Balance Restores Memory Deficit in Global Ischemia/Reperfusion Model in Rats.

Ali Mohamed Choucry, Muhammad Yusuf Al-Shorbagy, Ahmed Sherif Attia, Hanan Salah El-Abhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Neurotrophic effects of GScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ali Mohamed ChoucryDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El Aini st., Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Muhammad Yusuf Al-ShorbagyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El Aini st., Cairo, 11562, Egypt. muhammad.alshorbagy@pharma.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-6821
Ahmed Sherif AttiaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El Aini St., Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Hanan Salah El-AbharDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El Aini st., Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term memory impairment is reported in more than 50% of cardiac arrest survivors. Monosialoganglioside (GM1) provided neuroprotection in experimental models of stroke but failed to replicate its promise clinically for unknown reasons. GM1 stimulates the release of nerve growth factor (NGF), which is synthesized as a precursor protein (pro-NGF) that either mediates apoptosis through the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) or is cleaved by the protease furin (FUR) to yield mature NGF, the latter supporting survival through tropomyosin kinase receptor (Trk). The flavanol epicatechin (EPI) inhibits p75NTR-mediated signaling and apoptosis by pro-NGF. The aim of the current work is to test whether these two drugs affect, or communicate with, each other in the setting of CNS injuries. Using the two-vessel occlusion model of global ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), we tested if pharmacological modulation of Trk, p75NTR, and NGF balance with GM1, EPI, and their combination, can correct the memory deficit that follows this insult. Finally, we tested if FUR insufficiency and/or p75NTR-mediated apoptosis negatively affect the neurotherapeutic effect of GM1. Key proteins for Trk and p75NTR, FUR, and both forms of NGF were assessed. All treatment regiments successfully improved spatial memory retention and acquisition. A week after the insult, most Trk and p75NTR proteins were normal, but pro/mature NGF ratio remained sharply elevated and was associated with the poorest memory performance. Pharmacological correction of this balance was achieved by reinforcing Trk and p75NTR signaling. GM1 increased FUR levels, while concomitant administration of EPI weakened GM1 effect on pro-survival Trk and p75NTR mediators. GM1 neuroprotection is therefore not limited by FUR but could be dependent on p75NTR. Graphical Abstract "."

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBrain IschemiaCatechinG(M1) GangliosideMaleMemory DisordersNerve Growth FactorNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroprotective AgentsRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Growth FactorReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorReceptor, trkASignal TransductionCatechinG(M1) GangliosideNerve Growth FactorNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroprotective AgentsNgfr protein, ratReceptors, Growth FactorReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorReceptor, trkAEpicatechinGlobal ischemia/reperfusionMonosialogangliosideNerve growth factorp75 neurotrophin receptorTropomyosin kinase receptor

Identifiers

PMID30863991
OpenAlexW2921679047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.