ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019
Effects of delivery mode and age on motor unit properties of the external anal sphincter in women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-Series Analysis of Pregnancy and Childbirth Effects on Pelvic Floor Muscle Electrophysiology and Morphology in Rats.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study aimed to assess the individual and interactive effects of delivery mode and age on the function of the external anal sphincter (EAS) by analyzing the motor unit properties with intramuscular electromyography (EMG). Results are expected to improve the understanding of delivery-related occult obstetric EAS injuries and its development over the aging process and further support early clinical detection and intervention.
methodsA total of 49 postpartum women were recruited into four test groups according to their age and delivery mode: young vaginal delivery (Y-VD), elderly vaginal delivery (E-VD), young cesarean section (Y-CS), and elderly cesarean section (E-CS) groups. Anorectal ultrasonography, manometry, and intramuscular EMG were employed for comprehensive evaluation of EAS function.
resultsNo significant difference in anorectal ultrasonography and most manometry measurements was associated with delivery age or mode. Intramuscular EMG, however, revealed a statistically significant difference in the characteristics of motor unit potentials (MUPs), including duration, turns, phases, and multiphase wave ratio between four subject groups. No significant interaction effect between age and delivery mode was found.
conclusionsDelivery mode and age have a significant effect on the neuromuscular function of the EAS, suggesting a potential protectiveness of cesarean section against impairment to the EAS. Our results do not provide significant evidence regarding the interaction effect of delivery mode and age; further investigations are needed to confirm this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30863945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.