ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Long-term results after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative outcomes after inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians in Germany: an exploratory analysis of a retrospective single-centre cohort.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Characteristics, Therapeutic Approaches and Outcomes of Patients Older than 80 Years Old with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Compared with Younger Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Five-year oncological outcomes after enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) compared to conventional care for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort of 981 patients.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer within an ERAS protocol: a retrospective analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Presentation, Molecular Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Older than 80 Years Old.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic colectomy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an elderly patient with obstructive descending colon cancer and severe aortic stenosis: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic Resection of Transverse Colon Cancer with an Anomaly of the Middle Colic Artery Originating from the Splenic Artery: A Case Report.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes after elective laparoscopic surgery (LPS) for colorectal cancer patients over 80 years of age.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of all patients of 80 and above, who underwent elective colorectal resection, between January 2007 and January 2016. Data were analysed from a prospectively collected cancer database and cross checked with patient records. Determinants of survival were analysed using log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves.
resultsWe identified 293 patients; 110 underwent LPS. LPS had significantly better overall survival (p = 0.0065) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.006). The LPS group also had a shorter length of stay (LOS)-9 vs 11 days (p < 0.00001), 90-day mortality-5.5 vs 13.7% (p = 0.03) and required fewer blood transfusions 22.7 vs 40.4% (p = 0.002), when compared to open surgery (OPS). There was no difference in 30-day mortality 1.8 vs 4.9% (p = 0.22), anastomotic leakage 2.3 vs 6% (p = 0.20) or post-operative complication rates 44.5 vs 50.8% (p = 0.30).
conclusionsLPS for patients in their 80s is characterised by better overall and DFS compared to open procedures and is associated with shorter post-operative LOS, and significantly lower 90-day mortality. Patients operated on laparoscopically also required fewer post-operative blood transfusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.