Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863673›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Improved taxonomic assignment of rumen bacterial 16S rRNA sequences using a revised SILVA taxonomic framework.

Gemma Henderson, Pelin Yilmaz, Sandeep Kumar, Robert J Forster, William J Kelly, Sinead C Leahy, Le Luo Guan, Peter H Janssen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Smoking andInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles in the Feces of Juvenile Sika Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. RumenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gemma HendersonGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8258-2811
Pelin YilmazMicrobial Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Sandeep KumarGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7097-6848
Robert J ForsterLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
William J KellyGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-066X
Sinead C LeahyGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-6738
Le Luo GuanDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Peter H JanssenGrasslands Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-3502
AgResearch · NZAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The taxonomy and associated nomenclature of many taxa of rumen bacteria are poorly defined within databases of 16S rRNA genes. This lack of resolution results in inadequate definition of microbial community structures, with large parts of the community designated as incertae sedis, unclassified, or uncultured within families, orders, or even classes. We have begun resolving these poorly-defined groups of rumen bacteria, based on our desire to name these for use in microbial community profiling. We used the previously-reported global rumen census (GRC) dataset consisting of >4.5 million partial bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences amplified from 684 rumen samples and representing a wide range of animal hosts and diets. Representative sequences from the 8,985 largest operational units (groups of sequence sharing >97% sequence similarity, and covering 97.8% of all sequences in the GRC dataset) were used to identify 241 pre-defined clusters (mainly at genus or family level) of abundant rumen bacteria in the ARB SILVA 119 framework. A total of 99 of these clusters (containing 63.8% of all GRC sequences) had no unique or had inadequate taxonomic identifiers, and each was given a unique nomenclature. We assessed this improved framework by comparing taxonomic assignments of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence data in the GRC dataset with those made using the original SILVA 119 framework, and three other frameworks. The two SILVA frameworks performed best at assigning sequences to genus-level taxa. The SILVA 119 framework allowed 55.4% of the sequence data to be assigned to 751 uniquely identifiable genus-level groups. The improved framework increased this to 87.1% of all sequences being assigned to one of 871 uniquely identifiable genus-level groups. The new designations were included in the SILVA 123 release (https://www.arb-silva.de/documentation/release-123/) and will be perpetuated in future releases.

Indexed as

16S rRNA genesNext generation sequencingRumen bacteriaSILVATaxonomic assignmentWorking taxonomic framework

Identifiers

PMID30863673
PMCPMC6407505
OpenAlexW2920578945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.