Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863633›Full record

ArticleJournal of obesity2019

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery for Morbidly Obese with Diabetes Patients in Thailand.

Ithiphon Viratanapanu, Chavalit Romyen, Komol Chaivanijchaya, Sikarin Sornphiphatphong, Worawit Kattipatanapong, Ajjana Techagumpuch, Krit Kitisin, Suppa-Ut Pungpapong, Chadin Tharavej, Patpong Navicharern and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obesity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigating the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes from the Perspective of Adipose Tissue.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ithiphon ViratanapanuDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chavalit RomyenFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5749-2419
Komol ChaivanijchayaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sikarin SornphiphatphongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worawit KattipatanapongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ajjana TechagumpuchDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Krit KitisinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suppa-Ut PungpapongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chadin TharavejDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patpong NavicharernDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchaya BoonchayaanantDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-905X
Suthep UdomsawaengsupDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery is a choice for treatment in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM type 2) who have inadequate diabetes control with only medical treatment. However, bariatric surgery requires highly sophisticated equipment, and thus the cost of surgery seems to be very high following the procedure compared with the cost of conventional diabetes care. This raises the question of whether bariatric surgery is cost-effective for morbidly obese people with diabetes in Thailand. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation of bariatric surgery compared with ordinary treatment for diabetes control in morbidly obese DM type 2 patients in Thailand. Methods: Cost-effectiveness study was conducted, using a combination of decision tree and Markov model in analysis. Treatment outcomes and healthcare costs were incurred by data from literature review and retrospective cohort in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from September 2009 to March 2016 for the conventional and bariatric surgery group, respectively. One-way sensitivity was used for analysis of the robustness of the model. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Monetary benefits at a threshold of 150,000 to 200,000 Thai baht (THB) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on the Thailand gross domestic products (GDP) value was regarded as cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery. Results: Bariatric surgery significantly improves the clinical outcome including long-term diabetes remission rate, hemoglobin A1C, and body mass index (BMI). The incremental cost per QALY of bariatric surgery compared with the medication control is 26,907.76 THB/QALY which can consider bariatric surgery as a cost-effective option. Conclusions: Use of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese with DM type 2 patients is a cost-effective strategy in Thailand's context.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRetrospective StudiesThailand

Identifiers

PMID30863633
PMCPMC6377984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.