Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863623›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2019

Targeted mentoring for human immunodeficiency virus programme support in South Africa.

Geoffrey Jobson, Moyahabo Mabitsi, Jean Railton, Cornelis J Grobbelaar, James A McIntyre, Helen E Struthers, Remco P H Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey JobsonAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-7729
Moyahabo MabitsiAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4574-4743
Jean RailtonAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-0675
Cornelis J GrobbelaarAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7378-6401
James A McIntyreAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-1059
Helen E StruthersAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-3148
Remco P H PetersAnova Health Institute, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2124-7275
Anova Health Institute · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMentoring is a required component of health systems strengthening technical assistance interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Mentoring is useful because it does not necessarily compromise service delivery and promotes the sharing of newly acquired knowledge and skills. However, there is a lack of research on the implementation of mentoring in the context of the HIV epidemic in southern Africa.

objectivesThis qualitative evaluation focussed on understanding the implementation process of targeted mentoring for clinical practice, data management and pharmacy management, at public health care facilities in South Africa; and on identifying critical factors influencing the effectiveness of mentoring as a technical assistance intervention in this context.

methodsPurposive sampling was used to select participants from public health facilities in three South African Provinces. Participants were invited to take part in structured interviews. Datawere analysed using thematic analysis, and two core themes were identified: mentoring as knowledge and skills transfer; and mentoring as psychosocial support.

resultsIn terms of knowledge and skills transfer, the sequential implementation of proactive and reactive mentoring was critical. Initial proactive mentoring involved mentors initiating training and developing professional relationships with mentees. Thereafter, a reactive mentoring phase allowed mentees to request support when required. This enabled mentors to leverage real-world problems faced by health workers to support their implementation of new knowledge and skills. The availability and accessibility of mentors alongside the relationships between mentors and mentees provided psychosocial support for health care workers which facilitated their self-efficacy in implementing new knowledge and skills.

conclusionThese findings suggest that the success of mentoring programmes in LMICs may require specific attention to both knowledge transfer and the management of interpersonal relationships.

Identifiers

PMID30863623
PMCPMC6407314
OpenAlexW2911648470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.