Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863474›Full record

Trial reportPain research & management2019

Gabapentin versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix for the Alleviation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Radicular Origin: A Randomized Blind Multicentered Parallel-Group Noninferiority Trial.

Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hyup Lee, Jung-Hoon Kim, Sang Hyuk Min, Kun-Woo Park, Hyoung-Yeon Seo, Kwang-Sup Song

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain research & management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01127100 (Gabapentin Versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01127100 phase4completednot on this map

Gabapentin Versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix (TDF) for Chronic Neuropathic Pain (of Radicular Origin): A Multicenter Randomized, Parallel Group, Rater Blinded, Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2010 to 2011Enrolled108ConditionsNeuropathic Pain, Spinal StenosisArmstransdermal fentanyl matrix, gabapentin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chang Ju HwangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-3135
Jae Hyup LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-0266
Jung-Hoon KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-0263
Sang Hyuk MinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Kun-Woo ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang Chuk Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Yeon SeoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Sup SongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chonnam National University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University · KRDankook University Hospital · KRInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of studies have been published proposing various approaches to the treatment of neuropathic pain; however, to our knowledge, no attempts have been made to compare gabapentin and fentanyl in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of fentanyl matrix and gabapentin for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain of radicular origin. The study was designed as a randomized blind multicentered parallel-group noninferiority trial. A total of 108 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (≥4 intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale) were randomly prescribed either fentanyl matrix or gabapentin over a period of 56 days. In the primary analysis, the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix treatment was evaluated in relation to the efficacy of gabapentin based on the pain intensity difference (PID) at 56 days after the first dose of the drugs. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, improvement in functional status (the Korean-Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI)), improvement in depressive symptoms (Korean-Beck Depression Index (K-BDI)) between the 28th and 56th day, and adverse events (AEs). Analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint established the noninferiority of fentanyl matrix compared with gabapentin, with no statistically significant difference observed in the PID after 56 days for the two treatment groups. Similarly, analysis of pain relief revealed no significant differences between the groups on days 28 and 56. There was no difference in the K-ODI and K-BDI between the groups during the study period. The overall incidence of at least one AE was similar for fentanyl matrix (67.3%) and gabapentin (69.6%). The most commonly reported AEs for patients treated with fentanyl matrix and gabapentin included dizziness (30.8% vs. 44.6%, respectively), somnolence (26.9% vs. 35.7%), and constipation (15.4% vs. 17.9%). This study demonstrated that the analgesic effect of fentanyl matrix is noninferior in comparison with gabapentin and supports the use of fentanyl matrix as an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic neuropathic pain. This trial is registered with NCT01127100.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdultAnalgesicsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFentanylGabapentinHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPain MeasurementRadiculopathyTransdermal PatchAnalgesicsFentanylGabapentin

Identifiers

PMID30863474
PMCPMC6378801
OpenAlexW2912666485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.