Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863466›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2019

Clinical Significance of Preoperative Serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 Levels in Predicting the Resectability of Cholangiocarcinoma.

Tianyi Fang, Hao Wang, Yufu Wang, Xuan Lin, Yunfu Cui, Zhidong Wang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianyi Fang *Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hao Wang *Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yufu WangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xuan LinDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yunfu Cui *Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7393-1680
Zhidong Wang *Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-5758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the clinical significance of preoperative serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 levels in predicting the resectability of cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by radiologic examination and admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 1, 2011, to November 30, 2017, were retrospectively included. The relationship between the preoperative serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 levels and the resectability of cholangiocarcinoma was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as well as the best cut-off point. A total of 112 met the inclusion criteria. In 50 patients with radical surgeries, the levels of preoperative serums CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 were 5.0 ± 13.9 ng/mL, 15.3 ± 11.8 U/mL, and 257.5 ± 325.6 U/mL, respectively, which were lower than those in patients with unresectable tumor. Based on the ROC curve, the ideal CA19-9 cut-off value was determined to be 1064.1 U/mL in prediction of resectability, with a sensitivity of 53.2%, a specificity of 94.0%, and the area under the ROC curve of 0.73 (

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateCA-125 Antigencarbohydrate antigen 199, humanCarcinoembryonic AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30863466
PMCPMC6378785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.