Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30863437›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2019

White Matter Biomarkers Associated with Motor Change in Individuals with Stroke: A Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Study.

K P Wadden, S Peters, M R Borich, J L Neva, K S Hayward, C S Mang, N J Snow, K E Brown, T S Woodward, S K Meehan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Study Paradigms and Principles Investigated in Motor Learning Research After Stroke: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

K P WaddenFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1565-7334
S PetersUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2763-345X
M R BorichDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-6282
J L NevaUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8211-9923
K S HaywardUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.
C S MangUniversity of Regina, Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Regina, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-5355
N J SnowFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
K E BrownDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK.
T S WoodwardUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
S K MeehanDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-8803
L A BoydUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Physical Therapy, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-4549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a form of noninvasive repetitive brain stimulation that, when delivered over the contralesional hemisphere, can influence the excitability of the ipsilesional hemisphere in individuals with stroke. cTBS applied prior to skilled motor practice interventions may augment motor learning; however, there is a high degree of variability in individual response to this intervention. The main objective of the present study was to assess white matter biomarkers of response to cTBS paired with skilled motor practice in individuals with chronic stroke. We tested the effects of stimulation of the contralesional hemisphere at the site of the primary motor cortex (M1c) or primary somatosensory cortex (S1c) and a third group who received sham stimulation. Within each stimulation group, individuals were categorized into responders or nonresponders based on their capacity for motor skill change. Baseline diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indexed the underlying white matter microstructure of a previously known motor learning network, named the constrained motor connectome (CMC), as well as the corticospinal tract (CST) of lesioned and nonlesioned hemispheres. Across practice, there were no differential group effects. However, when categorized as responders vs. nonresponders using change in motor behaviour, we demonstrated a significant difference in CMC microstructural properties (as measured by fractional anisotropy (FA)) for individuals in M1c and S1c groups. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in clinical baseline measures or microstructural properties (FA) in the CST. The present study identifies a white matter biomarker, which extends beyond the CST, advancing our understanding of the importance of white matter networks for motor after stroke.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexSomatosensory CortexStrokeTreatment OutcomeWhite MatterBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30863437
PMCPMC6378804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.